Page 134 - Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West 411 - 533
P. 134

Envoys and Political Communication,411–533

         in southern Gaul, his local influence as a former and current imperial
         magistrate, and even his earlier military activities against the Goths. The
         misleading epic of Avitus and the Goths was a tactful way of denying this
         charge. 103


                         the portrayal of the envoy
         The social and political forces shaping Sidonius’ world are the same as
         those in Hydatius’ Gallaecia. Relations between local aristocracies and
         barbarian rulers have become the focus of political action in the provinces.
         The empire has a stronger presence in southern Gaul than in western
         Spain, and the authority of imperial office supports the influence of local
         magnates such as Avitus, just as it had in previous centuries. But relations
         between Avitus and the Goths are primarily unofficial, determined by
         Avitus’ standing as a local magnate. Where Hydatius portrays only conflict
         between Gallaecian leaders and the Sueves, Sidonius’ writings reveal a
         range of relations between Gauls and Goths, from hostility to cooperation.
         The presentation of these relationships to a non-provincial audience had
         to be very carefully crafted.
           Understandably, Sidonius’ panegyric on Avitus is a mixture of old
         and new: the traditional imagery of Roman military prowess, and the
         innovative presentation of barbarian alliance as a basis of authority. The
         new circumstances are carefully qualified. Avitus is shown as independent
         of the Goths, swaying them with his personal authority. His fitness to
         command the imperial army is fully established, yet his relations with
         the Goths are consistently dissociated from his military career. The value
         of his personal contacts with Toulouse is contrasted with the failure of
         exhausting warfare as a way to control the Goths. The plot of the Panegyric
         determines the character of its protagonist. At some expense to the truth,
         Avitus is portrayed repetitively fulfilling the functions of an envoy; doing
         so is the defining feature of the literary character of Avitus. 104


         103
           The emphasis on Avitus’ private contact with the Goths explains the quaint portrait of Avitus
           teaching Roman law and Virgil to the young Theoderic II; Sid. Ap., Carm. vii, 495–9, taken
           literally by almost all modern accounts. Theoderic II’s liberal education, however, need not be
           fictitious. Sidonius suggests that Toulouse maintained a tradition of secular education; Carm. vii,
           436, Palladia ...Tolosa; cf. Ausonius, Parentalia iii, 11, Commemoratio professorum Burdigalensium
           xvii, 7; xix,in The Works of Ausonius, ed. R. P. H. Green (Oxford, 1991), 28, 54. See in general
           Pierre Rich´ e, ‘La survivance des ´ ecoles publiques en Gaule au Ve si` ecle’, Le Moyen ˆ Age 63 =
           4th ser. 12 (1957), 421–36.
         104
           Mause, Darstellung des Kaisers, 100–1, correctly observes that ‘[Sidonius] lobt . . . nicht den Kaiser
           Avitus, sondern seinen Weg zum h¨ ochsten Amt . . . [According to Sidonius, Avitus comes to
           power] durch eine permanente Rastlosigkeit’, though it is misleading to see Avitus’ defining
           activities as ‘vor allem ...die kriegerische Bet¨ atigung’ (101,cf. 104).
                                      108
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139