Page 167 - Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West 411 - 533
P. 167

The saint as envoy: bishops’ Lives

           The two embassy accounts in Vita Orientii do notform partof an
         articulated structure as the equivalent narratives in Vita Germani do. The
         Vita of Orientius is more episodic; there are no temporal connectives
         between the episodes, and the only internal indicator of time is the state-
         ment, opening the embassy to Aetius and Litorius, that Orientius ‘had
         led a long life in the world before the Lord’. 104  The two embassy ac-
         counts, however, comprise most of the length of the short Vita, and are
         the most developed episodes. Moreover, the author’s general praises of
         Orientius (§ 4) stress his role as a securer of peace and effective intercessor,
         alongside his pastoral duties and success as an exorcist. Labor, Constantius’
         favoured term in describing Germanus, is used repetitively in this eulogy:
         ‘Orientius, this blessed pontifex worthy of God, was greatly needed not
         only for his preaching, and besides for the liberation of his homeland,
         but he also liberated the bodies of many besieged by demons...In his
         time, and by his labour, peace and security, for which he laboured greatly,
         entered the world.’ 105  Orientius was ‘salvation to both his citizens and to
         foreigners’. 106
           Orientius’ embassy to Aetius and Litorius contains echoes of Ger-
         manus’ confrontation with Goar: 107  the advanced age of the bishop is
         stressed at the outset of the journey; he meets an army on its march
         to the conflict he seeks to prevent; his appeal is rejected (by Litorius);
         when it is heeded (by Aetius), the army leader dismounts. The second
         embassy, to the court of the Gothic king, contains motifs more distinctly
         drawn from two scenes in Sulpicius’ Vita Martini and Dialogi concern-
         ing the emperor Magnus Maximus. 108  In Vita Martini, discussed above,
         Maximus invites Martin to join his convivium;inthe Dialogi, Maximus
         presses Martin to join in communion with the bishops involved in the
         condemnation of Priscillian. Though the two episodes are described dif-
         ferently by Sulpicius, in both cases, Martin is forced to compromise his
         integrity to obtain the success of his petitions. Orientius, similarly, is
         invited to the king’s convivium and given the opportunity to gain his re-
         quest, provided he will partake of the meat dishes, which his frugal regular
         diet excludes; the bishop compromises by blessing the food. Orientius is
         threatened during the dinner by leading figures of the court; this seems to
         be an awkward parallel to the tension of Martin’s refusal to pass the cup of
         wine to the emperor Maximus. 109  The earlier scene of Orientius’ embassy


         104
           Vita Orientii, 3: Et cum praestante Domino vitam longam in seculo produceret.
         105
           Vita Orientii, 4: Beatus iste et Deo dignus pontifex Orientius,non solum in praedicatione,nec non et patriae
           liberatione necessarius multum fuit,sed etiam multorum hominum obsessa a daemonibus corpora liberavit . . .
           Eius temporibus,eo laborante pax et securitas,pro qua multum laboravit,in orbem terrae introivit.
         106                          107
           Vita Orientii, 6: civibus salus et externis.  Constantius, Vita Germani, 28.
         108                               109
           Sulpicius, Vita Martini, 20; Dialogi iii, 11–14.  Vita Martini, 20.
                                      141
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172