Page 106 - Executive Warfare
P. 106

EXECUTIVE W ARF ARE



            If somebody attacks you head-on, you simply have to handle yourself
         with aplomb. However, your more sophisticated enemies understand that
         assaulting you openly may mean career suicide for them.
            At this level, the smart ones understand that they are not cutting down
         a sapling, but a mature oak that can’t be done in with one swing of the ax.
         So they tend to use a series of small, strategic cuts over time that drain
         your vital sap and damage you just enough so that you are no longer the
         strongest choice for the job you want.
            What you really have to defend against are campaigns, water-cooler
         campaigns, rumors that make the people in power uncomfortable with
                                       you.And generally, if your performance
                                       is good, these rumors will focus on your

                 YOUR MORE             personal qualities.
                 SOPHISTICATED           For example, one of my peers once
                 ENEMIES               made an issue out of my “callous lack of
                 UNDERSTAND THAT       commitment” to United Way, which, by
                 THEY ARE NOT          the way, I was not committed to. I just
                 CUTTING DOWN A        wasn’t callous about it. Now, United Way
                 SAPLING, BUT A        is clearly a good cause, and it supports a
                 MATURE OAK THAT       lot of very fine organizations. But I did-
                 CAN’T BE DONE IN      n’t like the system in some workplaces
                 WITH ONE SWING        that participated in United Way, includ-
                 OF THE AX.            ing my own.
                                         We managers were supposed to ask
                                       our employees to contribute a regular
         portion of their paychecks to United Way’s limited list of charities—and
         we competed with each other to see who could raise more money. Well,
         that seemed to me extraordinarily coercive and unfair. I was not going to
         pressure people dependent on me for every raise to change their giving
         patterns just so I could win some corporate do-bee contest. Giving should
         come from the heart, not from the coldness of a corporation’s required
         programs.



                                        86
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111