Page 459 - Fair, Geyer, and Okun's Water and wastewater engineering : water supply and wastewater removal
P. 459

JWCL344_ch12_398-456.qxd  8/4/10  9:37 PM  Page 417







                                                                                 12.5 Urban Runoff Control Practices  417































                                              Figure 12.5 Detention Basin
                                              (Source: Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Trounce_Pond.jpg)


                                         removal through filtering and vegetative uptake. Overall, the pollutant removal effective-
                                         ness of dry ponds has been shown to be less than that for wet ponds and constructed wet-
                                         lands (see Table 12.5).
                                         Design Considerations.  Retrofitting existing dry ponds with new outlet structures can
                                         sometimes enhance a municipal flood control structure to increase its pollution control
                                         effectiveness. Care must be taken, however, to ensure that the overflow capacity of the
                                         pond is maintained, so that it continues to fulfill its original flood control function.
                                         Temporary storage also can be provided for runoff from smaller storms by building a
                                         small berm around an existing outlet structure. Important design criteria include the de-
                                         sired detention time and the volume of runoff to be detained. These factors dictate the
                                         pond’s size and affect the pollutant removal efficiency of the structures. Most dry pond
                                         sizing criteria specify a certain detention time for a given design storm. For example, the
                                         Maryland Water Resources Authority specifies that water quality dry ponds must be
                                         large enough to accommodate the runoff volume generated by the 1-year, 24-hour storm
                                         to be released over a minimum of 24 hours. In contrast, the Washington State
                                         Department of Ecology specifies that dry ponds must be large enough to accommodate
                                         the runoff volume generated by the 2-year, 24-hour storm and release it over a period of
                                         40 hours.
                                             Dry ponds should also include some form of low-flow channel designed to reduce
                                         erosion; vegetation on the bottom of the pond to promote filtering, sedimentation, and
                                         uptake of pollutants; and an outlet structure designed to remove pollutants and with-
                                         stand clogging. In addition, dry pond designs typically include upstream structures to
                                         remove coarse sediments and reduce sedimentation and clogging of the outlet. Also,
                                         outlets might be connected to grassed swales (biofilters) to provide additional pollutant
                                         removal.
   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464