Page 103 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 103

86                SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                   For nontrivial solution, the determinant of  the Aj  must vanish, yielding


                                                     1      1

                                                                                        (3.84)





                      Since the roots of  (3.82) cannot be expressed in simple explicit form in terms of  u, w
                    and j3,  and in view of the complexity of  (3.84), it is not possible to obtain solutions by
                   direct methods, Three methods of  solution were given by Gregory & Paidoussis (1966a):
                    (i) a  rather  ingenious method  of  transforming the  original  problem  into  one  easier  to
                    solve numerically in  1966;+ (ii) a straightforward numerical method; and (iii) a Galerkin
                    solution. Of  these, only  (ii) will  be  outlined here, as follows: (a) starting with  a small
                    value of  u, say  u = 0.1, and trial values of  %e  (w) and 9m(w), say those for  u = 0, a
                    minimizing procedure (e.g. a secant method) finds the appropriate values of %e(@)  and
                    $m(w)  which result in %e(A) = 9nr(A) = 0 to within desired accuracy; (b) the value
                    of  u is increased by 6u, say by 0.1, and using the %e(w) and 9m(w) found in (a) as first
                    approximations, the minimizing procedure determines the complex frequency for u = 0.2;
                    and so on.
                      Clearly, this method has to be applied for each mode separately (for a given value of
                    #?), the locus to be followed depending on the initial trial value for %e(w).

                    fbl Second method

                    The fuller equation of motion (3.70) is nonhomogeneous, since the coefficients of deriva-
                    tives of   are explicit functions of 6 and/or implicit ones of  T, because u = u(r); hence,
                    the foregoing method of  solution is inapplicable. A solution for u = const. is, however,
                    readily  possible  via  the  Galerkin  method  and  will  be  given  here;  the  case  for  u =
                    u(r) is  considered in  Chapter 4.  This  is  approximate, not  only  in  the  strict numerical
                    sense, but also because of  the finite number of  terms utilized in the Galerkin expansion
                    (Section 2.1).
                      Let
                                                       00
                                              rl(6,   =   4rO) 41- (TI,                 (3.85)
                                                      r= 1

                    where qr(t) are the generalized coordinates of  the discretized system and &(c) are the
                    dimensionless eigenfunctions of  a beam with the same boundary conditions as the pipe
                    under consideration, and hence they are appropriate comparison functions (Section 2.1.3).
                    It is presumed that the series (3.85) may be truncated at a suitably high value of r, r = N.
                    Substitution  of  (3.85)  into  (3.70)  with  iC = 0,  followed  by  multiplication  by   and


                      +Computers were then  new and  slow, and 6 ntvh tixvcrs Kampy&<6mi; i.e.  poverty  (necessity) develops
                    ingenuity!
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108