Page 298 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 298

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: NONLINEAR AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS          279

              1981), the equations of motion were derived ab initio, and hence several sets of different
              and certainly different-looking equations have come into existence. How different, and
              how complete and correct? The answering of  these questions is not a trivial task, because
              of the different notations, approaches and assumptions involved in each of the derivations,
              and the relative obscurity of  some. Hence, a definitive comparison was not  undertaken
              until  recently (Semler et al.  1994), but  not  before a number of  de facto  ‘schools’ had
              developed, followers of each utilizing the same basic assumptions and similar final forms
              of the equations.
                In  this  section,  following  closely  Semler  et al.  (1994),  the  equations  of  motion
              are  derived  via  a  Hamiltonian  approach  (while  a  Newtonian  derivation  is  outlined
              in  Appendix G)  and,  then,  those  of  others’  are  discussed  and  their  completeness and
              correctness assessed.
                The system under consideration consists of  a tubular beam of  length L, internal cross-
              sectional area A, mass per  unit length m and  flexural rigidity Ef, conveying a fluid of
              mass M  per unit length with an axial velocity U, which may vary with time (Figure 5.1).
              The pipe is  assumed to be  initially lying along the xo-axis (in the direction of  gravity)
              and to oscillate in the  (xg, ZO) plane.






















              Figure 5.1  (a) The Eulerian (x, z) and Lagrangian (xo, zo) coordinate system and the coordinate s
              used  when  the  centreline  is  considered  to  be  inextensible;  (b) diagram  for  the  derivation  of  the
                inextensibility condition; (c) diagram defining terms for the statement of Hamilton’s principle.
                The basic assumptions made for the pipe and the fluid are as follows: (i) the fluid is
              incompressible; (ii) the velocity profile of  the fluid is uniform (plug-flow approximation
              for a turbulent-flow profile); (iii) the diameter of the pipe is small compared to its length,
              so that the pipe behaves like an Euler-Bernoulli  beam; (iv) the motion is planar; (v) the
              deflections of  the pipe are large, but the  strains are small; (vi) rotatory inertia and shear
              deformation are neglected; (vii) in the case ofa cantilevered pipe only, the pipe centreline
              is inextensible.

              5.2.1  Preliminaries

              As  in  the  derivation of  the  linear equations of  motion  (Section 3.3.1), two  coordinate
              systems  are  utilized:  the  Eulerian  (x, y, z) and  the  Lagrangian  (xg, yo, ZO) - refer  to
   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303