Page 305 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 305

286               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                   This  shows that the  velocity  of  the fluid with respect  to  the pipe  is  no  longer  constant.
                   Hence, the absolute velocity is





                   where the prime denotes the derivative with respect to XO. Consequently,


                                                                                        (5.30)

                     Relationship (5.17) derived for a cantilevered pipe still holds, with the difference that
                   the inextensibility condition is not valid here, so that U2 terms in this case survive in the
                   kinetic energy and are therefore not associated with the right-hand side of  (5.10), which
                   is zero! The total kinetic energy is given by
                              1"                  I'
                     %=  Lrn     (U2+W2)dx0+  $A4     [(u+U(l  +~'))~+(W++w')~]dx~. (5.31)

                     For the case of  non-rubber-like materials (u # OS),  some additional words are neces-
                   sary. The change of volume is no longer equal to zero, and &/SI = 1/(1 - ~uE). The
                   fluid being incompressible, one obtains

                       U(X0) = uo (1 + 2 u E) = Uo(1 + E) + uo E (2 u - 1) = u1 (xo) + uo E (2 u - l),
                   i.e.

                                                                                        (5.32)

                   To fourth order, the strain E  is given by

                                                                                        (5.33)
                                               E  = u'  + $ w'2 + 0(€4),
                   so that for a pipe  of  length L = 1, with  (uI  - 0.01,  and  IwI  - 0.1,  one obtains  IE~ -
                    1.5 x lop2. For  u = 0.4  and  0.3,  the  error  in  the  flow velocity associated with taking
                   u 2: 0.5 is 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively, which is of same order of magnitude as the error
                   made by assuming the velocity profile to be uniform. Hence, equation (5.31) may still be
                   considered valid.
                     The potential energy is considered next. To derive the strain energy, the axial strain is
                   itself decomposed into two components: a steady-state strain due to an externally applied
                   tension  To  and pressurization  P, and  an  oscillatory  strain  due  to  pipe  oscillation. By
                   reference to equation (5.13, this strain energy may be expressed as





                   By using (5.3, this is simplified to


                                                                                        (5.34)
   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310