Page 94 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 94

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: LINEAR DYNAMICS I                77

              the kinetic and potential energies of the system entirely ignored this aspect, proceeding as
              if  the system were closed, yet fortuitously ended up with the correct equation of motion.
              Benjamin  (1961a,b) was the  first to derive  a proper  statement for Hamilton’s principle,
              in his work related to articulated and continuously flexible cantilevered pipes. Benjamin
              rightly  maintained  that  Housner’s  derivation  was erroneous,  since  the proper  statement
              of  Hamilton’s principle was not used; thus, although the correct equation of motion was
              spuriously obtained for pipes with supported ends through a fortuitous error in the kinetic
              energy expression (Benjamin 1961a), there is no question that Housner’s derivation would
              fail if applied to cantilevered pipes. The controversy was resolved by McIver (1973) with
              the  aid  of  a  more  general  form  of  Hamilton’s  principle  for  open  systems,  concluding
              that Benjamin’s  argument was correct, but Housner’s derivation was also  ‘correct’, in  a
              sense,  though  for  unexpected  reasons.  Hence,  in  this  section  Hamilton’s  principle  will
              be  reproduced  as per  McIver’s  work, and then  the form obtained  by  Benjamin  and the
              equations  of  motion  will  be  derived  therefrom:  finally, Housner’s  derivation  for  pipes
              with  supported ends will be considered.
                Let us  first rewrite  the principle of  virtual  work for a system of  N  particles, each  of
              mass mi  and subjected to a force Fi. By d’Alembert’s principle,


                                                                                   (3.43)


              where ri is the position vector of each particle and Sri the associated virtual displacement
              compatible with the system constraints. It is first noted that


                                             6
                                         5 6ri = 6w - 6v,                          (3.44)
                                         i= 1
              is the  virtual work by  the  applied forces, part  of  which has been expressed  in  terms of
              the potential energy V.  Then, by re-writing






              where T  is the kinetic energy of the  system, equations (3.43)-(3.45)  lead to

                                                                                   (3.46)


                Consider  next  the  closed  system  of  Figure 3.7(a)  associated  with  the  closed  control
              volume y(t), bounded by the surface Yc(t), containing a collection of particles of density
              p, each with position  vector r and velocity u. The principle  of  virtual work in the form
              just derived may be written as


                                                                                   (3.47)

              where  Zc = T, - 1! is  the Lagrangian  of  the closed  system, 6W  is the  virtual work  by
              the  generalized  forces, and D/Dt  is the  material  derivative  following  a particle;  hence,
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99