Page 25 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 25

8                 SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW






                  where [MI, [C] and [K] are, respectively, the mass, damping and stiffness matrices, {q)
                  is the vector of generalized coordinates, and [Q} is the vector of the imposed forces; the
                  overdot denotes differentiation with time.
                    On  the  other  hand,  the  form  of  PDEs  tends  to  vary  much  more  widely  from  one
                  system to another. Although helpful classifications (e& into hyperbolic and elliptic types,
                  Sturm-Liouville-type  problems, and so on) exist, the fact remains that the equations of
                  motion of distributed parameter sytems are more varied than  those of discrete systems,
                  and so are the methods of solution. Also, the solutions are generally considerably more
                  difficult, if the equations are tractable at all by  other than numerical means. Furthermore,
                  the  addition of  some  new  feature to  a  known problem  (i.e. to  a problem  the  solution
                  of  which is known), is not easily  accommodated if  the system is continuous. Consider,
                  for instance the  situation of  the  articulated pipe  system which  can  be  described by  an
                  equation such as (2.1), and the ease with  which  the addition of  a supplemental mass at
                  the free end can be accommodated. Then, contrast this to the difficulties associated with
                  the addition of such a mass to a continuously flexible pipe: since the boundary conditions
                  will now be different, this problem has to be solved from scratch, even if the solution of
                  the problem without the mass (Le. the solution of  the simple beam equation) is  already
                  known. Hence, it  is often advantageous to transform distributed parameter systems into
                  discrete ones by  such methods as the Galerkin (or Ritz-Galerkin)  or the Rayleigh-Ritz
                  schemes (Meirovitch 1967).
                    In  this  section,  tirst  the  standard  methods  of  analysis  of  discrete  systems  will  be
                  reviewed. Then, the Galerkin method  will  be presented via example problems, as well
                  as methods for dealing with the forced response of continuous systems. Along the way,
                  a  number of  important definitions and  classifications of  systems, e.g. conservative and
                  nonconservative, self-adjoint, positive definite, etc., will be introduced.



                  2.1.1  The equations of motion
                  The equations of  motion of  discrete systems are generally derived by  either Newtonian
                  or Lagrangian methods. In  the  latter case,  for a  system of N  degrees  of  freedom  and
                  generalized coordinates qr, the Lagrange equations are

                                  d   aT     aT  av
                                    (G) -  + ag, =Qr,          r = 1,2, ..., N,

                  where T is the kinetic energy and V the potential energy of some or all of the conservative
                  forces acting on the system, while Qr  are the generalized forces associated with the rest
                  of the forces (Bishop & Johnson 1960; Meirovitch 1967, 1970).
                    For  continuous  (distributed  parameter)  systems,  the  equations  of  motion  may  be
                  obtained  either  by  Newtonian  methods  (by  taking  force  and  moment  balances  on  an
                  element of the system) or by  the use of Hamilton's principle and variational techniques,
                  i.e. by  using

                                            S I" (T - V+ W)dr = 0,                      (2.3)
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30