Page 275 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 275

256               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                    encountered, which were no different in character from those associated with the second
                    mode. However, no simple parametric (as opposed to combination) resonances associated
                    with the first mode were ever observed.
                      In one case, the flow velocity was increased sufficiently to cause flutter in steady flow.
                    Interestingly, by  adding  a  pulsatile  component  to  the  flow  at  certain  frequencies  and
                    amplitudes, it was found possible to eliminate the flutter.
                      Once more, these general observations are in qualitative agreement with theory. Quan-
                    titative agreement may be assessed from Figures 4.32 and 4.33. In Figure 4.32 only the
                    principal primary resonance region is shown, while in Figure 4.33(a) also the fundamental
                    secondary one. In the latter case it is noted that no experimental points are shown for large
                    k; in that range, the resonance boundary was very difficult to define, as there was super-
                    position of at least two resonance regions as shown in the theoretical results. Similarly, no
                    experimental points are shown corresponding to the lower parts of the theoretical curves,
                    which relate to lower subharmonics; in this case the experimentally observed resonance
                    was of such small amplitude as to make it virtually impossible to define its boundaries.






                                     40  .




                                     30   .

                                  0
                                     20  '



                                     10  '
                                         - Theory
                                        -A-   Experiment
                                      0
                                       0      0.1     0.2     0.3     0.4     0.5
                                                           @
                     Figure 4.32  Experimental  boundaries  of  the  second-mode  principal  parametric  resonance
                     compared  with  theory, for a cantilevered pipe with /? = 0.205, y  = 8.22, a! = 3.75 x   0 = 0
                                          and uo = 5.54 (Paidoussis & Issid 1976).

                       It appears that theory generally underestimates the extent of the regions of  resonance;
                    moreover, it overestimates the value of wcr, the minimum value of  k necessary to cause
                    parametric resonance. Agreement of  experiment with theory is reasonable but not very
                     good; plausible reasons for this are discussed by  Pdidoussis & Issid (1976),  among them
                     that certain assumptions in the theory are not quite true: e.g. that the flow-area of the pipe
                     does not change with changing internal pressure and that the wave speed in the elastic
                    pipe is essentially infinite.
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280