Page 44 - Formation Damage during Improved Oil Recovery Fundamentals and Applications
P. 44

26                                            David A. Wood and Bin Yuan


             LSFW is also effective in carbonate reservoirs with a range of potential
          mechanisms proposed to explain its impacts on oil recovery, e.g., wetta-
          bility (Al Shalabi et al., 2013), with IFT suggested as having a bigger
          impact on LSWF in carbonate reservoirs, with contact angle controlling
          final oil recovery (Al-adasani and Bai, 2012). Studies on chalk reservoirs
          have identified that wettability alterations are impacted by the concentra-
          tion of calcium and magnesium ions in the presence of sulfate (i.e., the
          divalent ions: Ca 21 ,Mg 21 ,SO 4 22 ) and the overall salinity level of the
          injected water (Zhang et al., 2006; Yousef et al., 2010; 2012; Hamouda
          and Gupta, 2017). Many offshore carbonate reservoirs (e.g., North Sea
          chalk reservoirs) have traditionally been flooded with sea water; so,
          LSWF core experiments often compare the impacts of injected fluids of
          various diluted brines with that of sea water. In doing so, Hamouda and
          Gupta (2017) found that brines diluted 1:10 versus sea water were more
          effective in terms of oil recovery from chalk reservoir than brines diluted
          1:50. Also, the sulfate-rich brines performed the best, and were associated
          with an increase in pH of the fluids, changes in the Ca 21  and Mg 21  ion
          concentrations and pressure drop that suggested ion exchange and precip-
          itation of magnesium minerals. Experiments conducted on oil-wet low-
          permeability limestones (Gandomkar and Rahimpour, 2015) suggested
          different outcomes for LSWF in secondary recovery mode versus tertiary
          recovery mode; with no benefits observed for the latter due to an increase
          in water relative permeability.
             The uptake of LSWF in a wide range of reservoirs is now high for
          several reasons: (1) low capital expenditure and incremental operating
          costs for those reservoirs already developed with water injection
          facilities and wells; (2) ease of injection into most oil reservoirs; (3) high
          incremental recovery gains for light to medium gravity oil reservoirs; (4)
          reduction in the scaling and corrosion of wellbore tubulars and surface-
          water-handling facilities (Collins, 2011); and (5) potentially avoid
          reservoir souring.






               2.3 FINES MIGRATION: DETACHMENT, TRANSPORT,
               AND REDEPOSITION

               Khilar and Fogler (1984) identified that low-salinity water injected
          into oil-bearing sandstones could cause significant formation damage
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49