Page 70 - Formation Damage during Improved Oil Recovery Fundamentals and Applications
P. 70

52                                            David A. Wood and Bin Yuan


          tends to lower the acid number of the oil and lower its negatively charged
          components. Sulfate is the most effective ion in terms of its ability to alter
          the wetting properties in carbonates (Shariatpanahi et al., 2011); its pres-
          ence increases the water-wetness of the system. Austad (2013) suggests
                                                              22
          that it is the combined effect of the presence of SO 4  ions and a
          decrease in the NaCl concentration of the injected fluid, which is impor-
          tant in altering wettability in carbonates and making LSWF effective.


          This combined effect is also temperature sensitive with 90 C to 110 C
          proposed as the optimum range, because although high temperatures are
          beneficial, they also lead to a reduction in sulfate ion concentrations in
          the formation fluids, due to sulfate mineral precipitation.
             In contrast to carbonates, the surface of silicate minerals, particularly the
          clays, is negatively charged. The permanent negative charge of clay minerals
          enables them to act as cation exchangers with a variable affinity to
          exchange with specific cations (Austad, 2013); that affinity increases in
                              1      1      1      21      21      1
          the following order Li , Na , K , Mg        , Ca    , H . As the
          cations adsorb onto the clay, the clay surfaces become more oil-wet, a
          process that is sensitive to the pH of the formation water (Madsen and
          Lind, 1998). As clays are normally not uniformly distributed throughout
          an oil reservoir, the clay-rich local areas may be less water-wet than the
          clay-poor zones.
             Tang and Morrow (1999), in experiments on the Berea sandstone,
          established that adsorption from crude oil, the presence of potentially
          mobile fines, and initial water saturation were all requirements for an
          increase in oil recovery to result from a decrease in salinity of the injected
          water. Lager et al. (2008) concluded that pH induced IFT reduction or
          emulsification and fines migration were effects rather than the driving
          mechanisms of LSWF, which, based on their experiments with sandstone
          cores, they concluded was primarily cation exchange (i.e., MIE).
          However, they noted for LSWF to be effective, the system also needs to
          involve oil with polar components (i.e., acids and/or bases), the indige-
          nous formation water needed to have meaningful concentrations of diva-
                            21     21
          lent cations, i.e., Ca  ,Mg  , and salinity of the injection fluid should
          be between 1000 ppm and 2000 ppm, but could work with salinities up
          to about 5000 ppm. The effective salinity level of the LSW seems to
                                          21     21                      1
          depend on the divalent (mainly Ca  ,Mg   ) versus monovalent (Na )
          ionic composition of the injection fluid, consistent with the findings of
                                                                    21
          Yildiz and Morrow (1996). In a MIE mechanism, it is the Ca    and
          Mg 21  ions which are adsorbed from the LSW by the rock matrix until it
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75