Page 40 - From Bombay to Bollywoord The Making of a Global Media Industri
P. 40

Media Industries and the State in an Era of Reform  >>  27

                   3
        urban space.  Building on these insights, I show how changes in state policies
        toward the media and entertainment industries and indeed, the very idea of
        creating and defining Bollywood as a global media industry, was shaped by
        a broader political discourse of cleaning and cleansing (safai) that played out
        at urban, national, and diasporic scales throughout the 1990s and 2000s.


        Reforming the National Family
        In an essay titled “The Diaspora in Indian Culture,” Amitav Ghosh writes
        of an “epic relationship” between India and the diaspora to emphasize the
        “tremendously historical and imaginative nature of diasporic belonging.” 4
        To speak of the “Indian diaspora,” then, is to take into account indentured
        laborers who left India to work as coolies on sugar plantations in countries
        such as Fiji and Guyana during the colonial era, immigrants in oil-rich Gulf
        nations, the more recent wave of high-tech migrants to locales such as the
                                               5
        Silicon Valley in the United States, and so on.  However, despite what is a
        long history of travel and migration, it is only since the late 1980s that expa-
        triate Indians have begun attracting attention. In fact, for nearly four decades
        after independence, the Non-Resident Indian (NRI) was inscribed in the
        Indian imagination as someone who had betrayed the nation to seek better
        fortunes elsewhere. Positioned squarely within a narrative of brain drain, the
        NRI was, until recently, “not really Indian.” As Sinha-Kerkhoff and Bal point
        out, unlike Gandhi, who had seen overseas Indians as integral to anticolonial
        struggles, Nehru believed that “expatriate Indians had forfeited their Indian
        citizenship and identity by moving abroad and did not need the support of
                           6
        their mother country.”  In the Nehruvian imagination, the “national family”
        was territorially bound. This was reflected very directly in official policy as
        well, as the following quote makes clear:

           It is the consistent policy of the government that persons of Indian origin
           who have taken foreign nationality should identify themselves with and
           integrate in the mainstream of social and political life of the country of
           their domicile. The government naturally remains alive to their interests
           and general welfare and encourages cultural contacts with them. As far as
           Indian citizens residing abroad are concerned, they are the responsibility
           of the government of India. 7

        It is important to note that there was considerable opposition to Nehru’s
        views. Right-wing groups such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (Global Hindu
        Council), which was formed during the 1960s with the goal of organizing
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45