Page 245 - From Smart Grid to Internet of Energy
P. 245

218   From smart grid to internet of energy


               the wide areas, communication systems that provide the desired perfor-
               mance should be as cost-effective as possible. Combining monitoring sys-
               tems and sensors with the CRNs can also improve the monitoring features of
               the SG systems. Therefore, the power outages can be significantly reduced
               through the CRNs [47, 57].

            6.3 CR network architectures

            Diversity in spectrum policies and communication technologies is one of the
            most important characteristics of the conventional wireless networks [58]. Sev-
            eral sections of spectrum are allocated for licensed communication systems
            whereas there still exist unlicensed spectrum bands. Hence, a good character-
            ization for CRN architectures is required to improve communication protocols
            for these networks. To ensure reliable communication through CRNs, the CR
            devices should always track the network status and radio environment by pro-
            viding coordination among the CR users. The mentioned coordination may
            cause some problems since the spectrum is time-dependent, and the CR users
            are generally mobile. The CRNs contain several types of radio communication
            systems operating together in the same geographic areas. Therefore, the CRNs
            can be taken into account as a kind of heterogeneous network containing numer-
            ous wireless communication systems. This diversity may be originated from
            connections among the base stations (BSs), access points (APs), mobile termi-
            nals (MTs), networking protocols, and CR terminals. Terminals and service
            providers can use the diversity of wireless access technologies. The CRNs
            authorize the users to continuously utilize spectrum bands. The main design tar-
            get of the CRN architectures is to improve the use of communication networks.
            From the point of view of the users, the network usage indicates to accomplish
            place and time independent wireless communication through the CRNs. In
            terms of operators, the service providers should not only be obliged to provide
            high quality service to mobile users, but they should also use network resources
            efficiently and effectively [15]. A typical architecture of CRNs that is illustrated
            in Fig. 6.5 contains several elements regarding both the PU networks and the SU
            networks.
               Typically, a primary network can be composed of PUs and primary BSs
            whereas a secondary network contains ensemble of the SUs with or without
            a secondary BS, as can be seen from the figure. A secondary BS that serves
            as the center of the secondary network generally arranges the OSA for the
            SUs. When various secondary networks employ the same spectrum band, a cen-
            tric network equipment called spectrum broker manage the use of this spectrum
            band. This equipment gathers operation information from secondary networks
            and assigns the spectrum effectively and fairly. The network architecture
            schemes of the CRNs can be classified into three categories as
            infrastructure-based (centralized), ad hoc (distributed), and mesh architectures.
            The following subsections introduce these architectures in detail.
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250