Page 227 - Geothermal Energy Systems Exploration, Development, and Utilization
P. 227

4.8 Outcome  203
                         development and to target the deviated wells into the rim of the stimulated zone.
                         A downhole seismic network of six stations registers the microseismic events
                         occurring during stimulation in Soultz, while a surface seismic network is also
                         available and well adapted for the microseismic event magnitude determination.
                           The strength of those microseismic events was up to ML = 2.9 for the stimulation
                         of GPK3. In order to prevent the development of strong microseismicity, the
                         stimulation strategy was adopted to lower flow rates and shorter duration (compare
                         Table 4.1).

                         4.8.1.2 Hydraulic Stimulation Groß Sch¨ onebeck
                         In the Groß Sch¨ onebeck wells, three stimulation treatments were performed in
                         the wells EGrSk3/90 and GtGrSk4/05, respectively. Table 4.3 summarizes the
                         productivity improvement of each stimulation. In the well EGrSk3/90, the first
                         stimulation was carried out in the sandstone section, the other two stimulations
                         included the underlying volvanic rocks as well.
                           The three hydraulic stimulations in the well GtGrSk4/05 were carried out
                         separately in two sandstone sections and the volcanic rocks. To determine
                         the improvement factor a production test was carried out for all sections
                         together. Individual contribution of each section was determined by a profiling
                         flowmeter.
                           Microseismic monitoring was performed during the last treatment in EGrSk3/90
                         from subsurface, but no events could be registered. During the first two treatments
                         in GtGrSk4/05 microseismicity was monitored in the well EGrSk3/90 at 3800 m
                         depth. Observation of the microseismic events reveals a very low seismicity during
                         and after stimulation (80 events).

                         Table 4.3  Summary of the stimulation treatments in the
                         wells EGrk3/90 and GtGrSk4/05 in Groß Sch¨onebeck.


                         Well              Duration Volume Flow rate Productivity Improvement  Located
                                                    3
                                                                   −1
                                                          –1
                                            (days)  (m )  (l s )  (l s −1  bar )  factor of  microseismic
                                                                       productivity  events
                         EGrSk3/90          0.51  167    3.75   0.027  Initial PI  Not measured
                         EGrSk3/90          0.58  307    6.22   0.059    2.2   Not measured
                         EGrSk3/90          0.24  338   16.4    0.112    1.9   Not measured
                         EGrSk3/90          1.0   859  4.3–14.7  0.207   1.9     No events
                         GtGrSk4/05 volcanics  0.06  4.4  0.83  0.004  Initial PI   –
                         GtGrSk4/05 volcanics  0.5  356  8.2    0.0849    22       78
                         GtGrSk4/05 sandstones1  0.3  250  9.5  0.028  Initial PI   –
                         GtGrSk4/05 sandstones1  0.5  356  8.2  0.142     5         2
                         GtGrSk4/05 sandstones2  0.2  170  10.3  0.034  Initial PI  –
                         GtGrSk4/05 sandstones2  0.5  356  8.2  0.057    1.67  Not measured
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232