Page 25 - Global Political Economy_Understanding The International Economic Order
P. 25

CHA PTER O NE
                                   kets. The global economy and the rules governing it, they believe,
                                   should be guided by the policy prescriptions of neoclassical econom-
                                   ics and be based on market principles. Free trade, freedom of capital
                                   movements, and unrestricted access by multinational firms to markets
                                   around the globe should be the goals of international governance.
                                   With the triumph of the market, economic logic and the relative effi-
                                   ciencies of national economies should determine the distribution of
                                   economic activities and wealth (and, of course, of power) around the
                                   world. Critics of globalization, on the other hand, challenge this em-
                                   phasis on the importance of free trade and open markets.
                                     Despite the growing importance of the market, historical experi-
                                   ence indicates that the purpose of economic activities is ultimately
                                   determined not only by markets and the prescriptions of technical
                                   economics, but also (either explicitly or implicitly) by the norms, val-
                                   ues, and interests of the social and political systems in which eco-
                                   nomic activities are embedded. Although economic factors will play
                                   an important role in determiningthe character of the global economy,
                                   political factors will be of equal, and perhaps greater, importance.
                                   The nature of the global economy will be strongly affected by the
                                   security and political interests of, and the relations among, the domi-
                                   nant economic powers, includingthe United States, Western Europe,
                                   Japan, China, and Russia. It is highly unlikely that these powers will
                                   leave the distribution of the global economic product and the impact
                                   of economic forces on their national interests entirely up to the mar-
                                   ket. Both economic efficiency and national ambitions are driving
                                   forces in the global economy of the twenty-first century.
                                     In this book, I have taken a “political economy” approach that
                                   integrates economic and political analysis with other modes of schol-
                                   arly analysis. Formal economic theories provide indispensable tools,
                                   facilitatingcomprehension of economic developments; the conven-
                                   tional theory of international trade, newly gained insights from the
                                   theory of industrial organization, and other theoretical developments
                                   in economic science provide important additional ideas. However,
                                   economic theories alone are not sufficient for an understandingof
                                   developments and their significance for economic and political affairs.
                                   One must also draw upon ideas and insights from history, political
                                   science, and the other social sciences. In brief, a true “political econ-
                                   omy” is prerequisite to an improved comprehension of the implica-
                                   tions of new developments for international (and, where relevant, do-
                                   mestic) economic affairs.
                                     The intensity and importance of the debate over the nature of the
                                   changingworld economy makes one aware of a troublingparadox.
                                   At the same time that economic issues have moved to the center of

                                   12
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30