Page 153 - Green Building Through Integrated Design
P. 153

ADDITIONAL COST CONSIDERATIONS  129



                      power, chilled water, and/or electricity; open space; multiple transportation
                      options; and other services that result in anywhere from 5 to 15 “embedded” LEED
                      points toward certification for any project. Similarly, a shopping center developer
                      with higher standards for site development could “embed” 6 to 12 LEED points for
                      every retail store that wanted to become certified, without the store having to spend
                      anything more.



                      PROJECT SIZE
                      You would expect smaller projects to have a higher cost premium for LEED certifica-
                      tion, because certain of the costs of LEED (e.g., documentation assistance, energy
                      modeling, and building commissioning) have fixed-cost elements independent of proj-
                      ect size that will add to the cost per square foot. Above a certain size, perhaps 50,000
                      square feet for new projects or major renovations, this “size cost premium” starts to
                      disappear. Let’s say such a project has a budget of $5 million and let’s say that the
                      LEED “fixed cost” items for a Silver certification total $75,000. That’s a cost premium
                      of 1.5 percent, generally quite tolerable for most projects, assuming there are not too
                      many other net cost additions from higher energy efficiency, for example. At $10 million,
                      the fixed cost premium is likely below 1 percent.


                      FEASIBILITY OF LEED MEASURES

                      Another cost factor is the feasibility of LEED actions. For example, in most urban
                      areas, recycling 75 percent of construction waste is virtually a no-cost item for the
                      project. However, for projects in rural areas, there may be no construction waste
                      recycling opportunities. To get the “lost” two points from some other LEED meas-
                      ures, for example, might add cost to an identical project, everything else held equal,
                      if it wanted to qualify for the same certification level. The same would hold true for
                      many of the materials and resources credits that might rely on a local supply chain
                      for supply of recycled-content materials or certified wood products. (Ironically,
                      more than a few of the LEED Platinum projects we profile in this book are located
                      in rural areas.)


                      DESIGN PROCESS AND CREDIT SYNERGIES
                      Certain sustainability measures exhibit synergies that generate multiple LEED credits
                      from one action. Take green roofs, for example. Green roofs not only reduce the urban
                      heat island effect, but also mitigate stormwater runoff, create habitat and urban open
                      space, conserve water use in landscaping, reduce building energy use, and may even
                      qualify for an innovation credit in the LEED system. The same measure could provide
                      for up to 8 LEED points, serving to offset the higher costs of green roofs, typically $10
                      to $20 per square foot, by eliminating other costs that would have been incurred to
                      achieve equivalent benefits. Of course, in certain climates such as the hotter and drier
                      western states, reflective roofs may represent a better approach.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158