Page 578 - Handbook Of Integral Equations
P. 578

and the second by a summand that vanishes on the negative semiaxis. Thus, the dual equation can
               be written in the form

                                  1    ∞
                           y(x)+ √       K 1 (x – t)y(t) dt = f(x)+ ξ – (x),
                                   2π  –∞
                                  1     ∞                               – ∞ < x < ∞,       (41)
                           y(x)+ √       K 2 (x – t)y(t) dt = f(x)+ ξ + (x),
                                   2π  –∞
               where the ξ ± (x) are some right and left one-sided functions so far unknown.
                   On applying the Fourier integral transform, we arrive at the relations
                                                  –                            +
                           [1 + K 1 (u)]Y(u)= F(u)+ Ξ (u),  [1 + K 2 (u)]Y(u)= F(u)+ Ξ (u).  (42)
                                                  –
                                         +
               Here the three functions Y(u), Ξ (u), and Ξ (u) are unknown.
                   Now on the basis of (42) we can find
                                                     –
                                                                   +
                                              F(u)+ Ξ (u)  F(u)+ Ξ (u)
                                       Y(u)=             =                                 (43)
                                               1+ K 1 (u)    1+ K 2 (u)
               and eliminate the function Y(u) from relations (42) by applying formula (43). We obtain the
               Riemann boundary value problem in the form
                                   1+ K 2 (u)  –  K 2 (u) – K 1 (u)
                             +
                            Ξ (u)=         Ξ (u)+             F(u),    –∞ < u < ∞.         (44)
                                   1+ K 1 (u)       1+ K 1 (u)
                ◦
               1 . Assume that the normality conditions are satisfied, i.e.,
                                          1+ K 1 (u) ≠ 0,  1 + K 2 (u) ≠ 0;
               then we can rewrite the Riemann problem (44) in the usual form (see Subsection 10.4-4)

                                                –
                                     +
                                    Ξ (u)= D(u)Ξ (u)+ H(u),    –∞ < u < ∞,                 (45)
               where
                                         1+ K 2 (u)        K 2 (u) – K 1 (u)
                                  D(u)=          ,  H(u)=              F(u).               (46)
                                         1+ K 1 (u)          1+ K 1 (u)
                   The Riemann problem (45), (46) is equivalent to Eq. (40); in particular, they are solvable and
               unsolvable simultaneously and have the same number of arbitrary constants in the general solutions.
                   If the index
                                                      1+ K 2 (u)
                                               ν = Ind                                     (47)
                                                      1+ K 1 (u)
               is positive, then the homogeneous equation (40) (f(x) ≡ 0) has exactly ν linearly independent
               solutions, and the nonhomogeneous equation is unconditionally solvable and the solution depends
               on ν arbitrary complex constants.
                   For the case ν ≤ 0, the homogeneous equation has no nonzero solutions. For ν = 0, the
               nonhomogeneous equation is unconditionally solvable, and a solution is unique. If the index ν is
               negative, then the conditions
                                ∞

                                   K 2 (u) – K 1 (u)   du
                                                 F(u)       =0,     k =1, 2, ... , –ν      (48)
                                    +
                                  X (u)[1 + K 1 (u)]  (u + i) k
                               –∞
               are necessary and sufficient for the solvability of the nonhomogeneous equation.
                   For all cases in which a solution of Eq. (40) exists, it can be found by the formula
                                     ∞        –                   ∞        +
                               1       F(u)+ Ξ (u)  –iux    1       F(u)+ Ξ (u)  –iux
                        y(x)= √                   e   du = √                   e   du,     (49)
                               2π  –∞   1+ K 1 (u)           2π  –∞  1+ K 2 (u)
                            –
                      +
               where Ξ (u), Ξ (u) is a solution of the Riemann problem (45), (46) that is constructed by the scheme
               of Subsection 10.4-4 (see Fig. 3).
                 © 1998 by CRC Press LLC








               © 1998 by CRC Press LLC
                                                                                                             Page 561
   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583