Page 661 - Handbook Of Integral Equations
P. 661

We regard the polynomial U ρ (z) as an operator that maps the right-hand side f(t) of Eq. (1) to
               the polynomial that interpolates the Cauchy type integral (37) as above. Let us denote this operator
               by
                                                1
                                                2  T[f(t)] = U ρ (z).                      (38)
               Here the coefficient  1  is taken for the convenience of the subsequent manipulations.
                                2
                   Furthermore, by analogy with the normal case, from (36) we can find
                           +
                         X (t)      1  f(t)    1       f(τ)    dτ   1         1
                 +
               Φ (t)=                       +                      –  T[f(t)] –  A 0 (t)P ν–p–1 (t) ,
                       η                 +                +
                                  2 s(t)X (t)  2πi  L  s(τ)X (τ) τ – t  2     2
                         (t – β j ) p j
                      j=1
                           –
                         X (t)       1  f(t)     1       f(τ)    dτ   1         1
                 –
               Φ (t)=              –          +                      –  T[f(t)] –  A 0 (t)P ν–p–1 (t) .
                       µ                   +                +
                                    2 s(t)X (t)  2πi  L  s(τ)X (τ) τ – t  2     2
                         (t – α k ) m k
                      k=1
               We introduced the coefficient – 1  in the last summands of these formulas using the fact that the
                                         2
               coefficients of the polynomial P ν–p–1 (t) are arbitrary. Hence,

                                  ∆ 1 (t)f(t)    1        f(τ) dτ
                             –
                       +
                ϕ(t)= Φ (t)–Φ (t)=        +∆ 2 (t)                   –T[f(t)]–A 0 (t)P ν–p–1 (t) , (39)
                                      +
                                  s(t)X (t)      πi    s(τ)X (τ)(τ – t)
                                                            +
                                                     L
               where
                                                                                   –
                               +
                                                                    +
                                              –
                              X (t)         X (t)                  X (t)         X (t)
                   ∆ 1 (t)=            +             ,  ∆ 2 (t)=           –              .
                            η              µ                     η             µ

                          2   (t – β j ) p j  2  (t – α k ) m k  2  (t – β j ) p j  2  (t – α k ) m k
                            j=1           k=1                    j=1           k=1
                   We write
                                                     +
                                                               –
                                           Z(t)= s(t)X (t)= r(t)X (t),                     (40)
               and, applying relation (34), represent formula (39) as follows:
                           1            b(t)Z(t)     f(τ) dτ
                   ϕ(t)=       a(t)f(t) –                  + b(t)Z(t)T[f(t)] + b(t)Z(t)P ν–p–1 (t).
                         A 0 (t)          πi    L  Z(τ) τ – t
                   Let us introduce the operator R 1 [f(t)] by the formula
                                     1           b(t)Z(t)     f(τ) dτ
                          R 1 [f(t)] ≡   a(t)f(t) –                  + b(t)Z(t)T[f(t)] ,   (41)
                                   A 0 (t)         πi    L  Z(τ) τ – t

               and finally obtain
                                         ϕ(t)= R 1 [f(t)] + b(t)Z(t)P ν–p–1 (t).           (42)

                   Formula (42) gives a solution of Eq. (1) for the exceptional case in which ν – p > 0. This
               solution linearly depends on ν –p arbitrary constants. If ν –p < 0, then the solution exists only under
               p – ν special solvability conditions imposed on f(t), which follow from the solvability conditions
               for the Riemann problem (35) corresponding to this case.




                 © 1998 by CRC Press LLC







               © 1998 by CRC Press LLC

                                                                                                             Page 644
   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666