Page 215 - Handbook Of Multiphase Flow Assurance
P. 215

214                            8.  Flow assurance stability issues

                 thickness in subsea flowlines is 3 in., which provides sufficient time for the operator to take
                 preventive action to manage the risk of flow assurance blockages in the system.
                   Startup of production is a transient operation which can cause a surge of liquids settled in
                 the low spots of the production system to arrive in the separator and stop the production if
                 separator is not sufficiently large to hold the arrived liquids. Transient multiphase simulation
                 tools are available to estimate the volume of liquid surge at different well ramp-up rates during
                 a start-up.

                 Rate ramp-up and ramp-down

                   Production operator may increase or decrease wells' production rate according to the field
                 development plan.
                   During a flow rate ramp-up an event similar to a liquid surge during start-up may be
                 expected. Higher flow rate sweeps liquid holdup accumulated in the flow line; the liquid
                 travels to the separator and temporarily increases the liquid rate.
                   During a flow ramp-down, less liquid is expected to be produced to the process facilities.
                 At lower flow rate more liquid will accumulate in the flow line.


                                            Slugging in gathering lines

                   Gathering lines carrying multiphase fluids may also experience slugging when slugs orig-
                 inate in a wellbore as the well starts to be loaded with liquids.
                   Choke opening or artificial lift methods may be used to reduce the liquid loading in wells
                 and slugging in the gathering lines.
                   Lowering production tubing into the Boycott range may also help stabilize wells produc-
                 tion and extend well life.
                   If no method works to mitigate the slugging, then flowline restraints or bracing for the
                 flowlines should be used as recommended by Hill and Wood (1994) to help with the loads on
                 the pipework.



                               Calculation of slug impact force on Tees and Elbows

                   Slugs traveling at high velocity through a production flow line carry a substantial momen-
                 tum M and impact the pipe locations with change in direction with a significant force. Slugs
                 are known to have knocked flow lines off their support stands and caused significant (greater
                 than 1 pipe diameter) movement.
                   Slugging has led to loss of integrity as in-field pipelines made of fiber epoxy got discon-
                 nected from the Tee at the location of slug impacts.
                   Liquid slug is pushed through a flow line by gas. Liquid slug travels at nearly the velocity
                 of gas which pushes the slug like a piston.
                   A simplified correlation for  slug  length based  on  pipe diameter was proposed  in
                 Chapter 4.
                                                          [
                                                  L ft [] = ( Dinch]) 2
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220