Page 190 - Handbook of Biomechatronics
P. 190

Upper-Limb Prosthetic Devices                                187


              to the amputee. This is what Simpson clearly saw as the success of the system,
              and this is why he coined the phrase EPP for it. It can be said that body-
              powered prostheses are a subset of EPP systems and that is why they were
              successful in the past. EPP control of externally powered prosthetic joints is
              similar in concept to power steering of the car. The driver feels, through the
              handling of the steering wheel, the state of the car’s front wheels. Further-
              more, the driver cannot “beat” the response of the front wheels because the
              steering wheel and the front wheels are coupled. This unbeatable coupling
              provided by a mechanical linkage is the essence of EPP.
                 The use of tools such as hammers, pens, knives, and racquets illustrate the
              simple form of EPP. We use these extensions of our body without thinking
              because we extend our proprioception through these tools. A tennis player
              does not watch the racquet during swing. The proprioceptive capabilities of
              the wrist and other joints have been extended to include the racket. The
              racket becomes a natural extension of the arm. Control of another joint
              by a physiological joint through EPP is more complex than the EPP control
              of a simple rigid extension. The artificial joint may be powered by the phys-
              iological joint, or it can be externally powered and receiving the control
              input from the physiological joint. Both can be forms of EPP or not. The
              prerequisite for the EPP control of another joint is that the two joints,
              the physiological joint and the artificial joint, must be mechanically inter-
              connected. In that way the physiological and the artificial joint have equiv-
              alent kinematics and kinetics. The force, position, and velocity of the
              artificial joint is transmitted through the Bowden cable and is sensed by
              the physiological joint and vice versa (Fig. 5). This is an “unbeatable”
















              Fig. 5 Diagram showing the “1-1” mapping of the force, position, and velocity between
              the control site and the prosthesis. This mapping is provided by a rigid mechanical link-
              age connecting the control site with the prosthesis. Shoulder elevation/depression is
              associated with elbow flexion/extension. Shoulder protraction/retraction is associated
              to wrist pronation/supination. (From Northwestern University Prosthetics Research
              Laboratory (NUPRL).)
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195