Page 114 - Handbook of Electronic Assistive Technology

Chapter 4 • Assessment and Outcomes 101

Beaton, D.E., Davis, A.M., Hudak, P., McConnell, S., 2001. The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and
Hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now? British Journal of Hand Therapy 6 (4), 109–118.
Bernd, T., Van der Phijl, D.D.E., Witte, L.P., 2009. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assis-
tive technogoy in rehabilitation practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 16, 146–158.
Borg, J., Berman-Bieler, R., Khasnabis, C., Mitra, G., Myhill, W.N., Samant, Raja, D., 2015. In: Assistive
Technology for Children with Disabilities: Creating Opportunities for Education, Inclusion and
Participation a Discussion Paper. Unicef WHO.
Cole, D.C., Hudak, P.L., 1994. Prognosis of non-specific work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck
and upper extremity. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29, 657–668.
Cook, A.M., Hussey, S.M., 2002. Assistive Technologies. Mosby.
Cook, A., Miller Polgar, J., 2007. Cook and Hussey’s Assistive Technologies, third ed. Elsevier.
Copley, J., Ziviani, J., 2004. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities.
Occupational Therapy International 11 (4), 229–243.
Day, H., Jutai, J., Campbell, K.A., 2002. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assis-
tive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disability and Rehabilitation 24, 31–37.
Daly, J., Hogan, N., Perepezko, E.M., Krebs, H.I., Rogers, J.M., Goyal, K.S., Dohring, M.E., Fredrickson, E.,
Nethery, J., Ruff, R.L., 2005. Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimula-
tion following stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 42 (6), 723–736.
De Jonge, D., Scherer, M., Rodger, S., 2007. Assistive Technology in the Workplace. Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis,
MO.
Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Ska, B., 1996. Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction
with assistive technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology 8, 3–13.
Desideri, L., Bizzarri, M., Bitelli, C., Roentgen, U., Gelderblom, G.J., de Witte, L., 2015. Implementing a rou-
tine outcome assessment procedure to evaluate the quality of assistive technology service delivery for
children with physical or multiple disabilities: perceived effectiveness, social cost, and user satisfac-
tion. Assistive Technology 28, 30–40.
Douglas, H., Swanson, C., Gee, T., Bellamy, N., 2005. Outcome measurement in Australian rehabilitation
environments. Journal of Rehabilitation 37, 325–329.
Edyburn, D.L., Smith, R.O., 2002. The ATOMS Project: measuring assistive technology outcomes. In: Paper
Presented at the 20th Annual Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D.L., 2015. Expanding the use of assistive technology while mindful of the need to understand
efficacy. In: Edyburn, D.L. (Ed.). Edyburn, D.L. (Ed.), Efficacy of Assistive Technology Interventions, vol.
1. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK, pp. 1–12.
Enderby, P., John, A., Petheram, B., 2006. Therapy Outcome Measures for Rehabilitation Professionals, sec-
ond ed. Wiley, London.
Federici, S., Scherer, M., Borsci, S., 2014. Technology and Disability 26 (1), 27–38.
Federici, S., Scherer, M., 2017. Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook. CRC Press.
Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Scherer, M.J., DeRuyter, F., 2003. A framework for the conceptual modelling of
assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation 25, 1243–1251.
Gelderblom, G.J., de Witte, L.P., 2002. The assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and costs.
Technology and Disability 14, 91–94.
Jette, D.U., Halbert, J., Iverson, C., Miceli, E., Shah, P., 2009. Use of standardized outcome measures in
physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Physical Therapy 89, 125–135.
Jutai, J., Day, H., 2002. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) Technology and Disability,
vol. 14, pp. 107–111.