Page 224 - Handbook of Electronic Assistive Technology

212 HANDBOOK OF ELECTRONIC ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

Light, J.C., Beukelman, D.R., Reichle, J., 2003b. Communicative Competence for Individuals Who Use AAC.
Brookes Publishing Company, Baltimore, MD.
Light, J., Drager, K., 2007. AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs:
state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication
(Baltimore, Md.: 1985) 23 (3), 204–216.
Light, J., McNaughton, D., 2013. Putting people first: Re-Thinking the role of technology in augmentative
and alternative communication intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 29 (4),
299–309.
Light, J., McNaughton, D., 2014. Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative
and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and
Alternative Communication 30 (1), 1–18.
Lund, S.K., Light, J., 2007. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative
communication: Part III – contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23 (4),
323–335.
McDonald, S., Quinn, F., Vieira, R., O’Brien, N., White, M., Johnston, D.W., Sniehotta, F.F., 2017. The state of
the art and future opportunities for using longitudinal n-of-1 methods in health behaviour research: a
systematic literature overview. Health Psychology Review (November), 1–17 7199.
McNaughton, D., Light, J., 2015. What we write about when we write about AAC: the past 30 Years of
research and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 31 (4), 261–270.
McNaughton, D., Light, J., Naughton, D.M.C., 2013. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: ben-
efits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication 29 (2), 107–116.
Millar, D.C., Light, J.C., Schlosser, R.W., 2006. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication
intervention on the speech production disabilities: a research review. Journal of Speech, Language,
and Hearing Research 49 (April), 248–264.
Morris, J.T., Bryen, D.N., 2015. Use of mainstream wireless technology by adults who use augmentative and
alternative communications. Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities 101–115.
Myrden, A., Schudlo, L., Weyand, S., Zeyl, T., Chau, T., 2014. Trends in communicative access solutions for
children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology 29 (8), 1108–1118.
Pennington, L., Marshall, J., Goldbart, J., 2007. Describing participants in AAC research and their com-
municative environments: guidelines for research and practice. Disability and Rehabilitation 29 (7),
521–535.
Rowland, C., Fried-Oken, M., Steiner, S. a M., Lollar, D., Phelps, R., Simeonsson, R.J., Granlund, M., 2012.
Developing the ICF-CY for AAC profile and code set for children who rely on AAC. Augmentative and
Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985) 28 (1), 21–32.
Russo, M.J., Prodan, V., Meda, N.N., Carcavallo, L., Muracioli, A., Sabe, L., et al., 2017. High-technology
augmentative communication for adults with post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review. Expert Review
of Medical Devices 14 (5), 355–370.
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, M.C., Muir, J.A., Haynes, R.B., Richardson, W.S., 1996. Evidence based
medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 312, 71.
Schlosser, R.W., Raghavendra, P., 2004. Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative commu-
nication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication 20 (1), 1–21.
Smith, M., 2016. Evidence for impact and impact of evidence. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative
Communication 32 (4), 227–232. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1250283.
Soto, G., Clarke, M.T., 2017. Effects of a conversation-based intervention on the linguistic skills of chil-
dren with motor speech disorders who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of
Speech Language and Hearing Research 60 (7), 1980.