Page 342 - Handbook of Electronic Assistive Technology
P. 342

Chapter 11 • Robotics  331



                 Table 11-2  Socially Assistive Robots

                 Robot             Company/Project                       References
                 AIBO              Sony                                  Kaplan (2000)
                 Care-O-Bot        Fraunhofer IPA                        Schaeffer and May (1999)
                 CompanionAble     The European FP7 Project CompanionAble (2008–12)  Gross et al. (2011)
                 Huggable          Massachusetts Institute of Technology  Santos (2012)
                 iCAT              EU FP7 ICT-215554 project LIREC German Research   van Breemen et al. (2005)
                                   Foundation (DFG) within the SFB 673 – Alignment in
                                   Communication – Project C2
                 MeBot             The Digital Life and Things That Think Consortia  Adalgeirsson and Breazeal (2010)
                 NAO               Aldebaran-Robotics                    Gouaillier et al. (2009)
                 Nexi              National Science Foundation Research Grants BCS   Fink (2012)
                                   08-27084
                 NurseBot          Information Technology Research ITR Program (Grant   Pollack (2002)
                                   No. 0085796)
                 Paro              Intelligent System Co., Ltd           Kidd et al. (2006)
                 QRIO              Socially Intelligent Machines Lab (designed by Carla   Geppert (2004)
                                   Diana and Meka Robotics)
                 RIBA              Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society  Mukai et al. (2010)
                                   for the Promotion of Science
                 USC Robot         National Science Foundation under Grants IIS-0713697, Fasola and Mataric (2010)
                                   CNS-0709296 and IIS-1117279





                 available are not able to replace human care. It is paramount that both SARs and human
                 interaction work hand in hand. If the component of human caregiver interaction is no
                 longer in place, there is a concern over the user’s increased isolation, despite therapeutic
                 benefits (Feil-Seifer and Mataric, 2011).
                   Some of the more popular SARs in research papers are listed in Table 11-2.
                   The Huggable Robot (Santos, 2012) is the creation of the Personal Robots Group, MIT.
                 This robot was designed to look like a teddy bear, as a symbol of comfort for paediat-
                 ric users. The Huggable has two modes of function: (1) being a fully autonomous robot
                 the Huggable is able to interpret and respond to human interactions with it, and (2) the
                 Huggable is able to work as a semi-autonomous robot avatar, which can be controlled on
                 some level.
                   PARO was created by Takanori Shibata from the Intelligent System Research Institute
                 in Japan (Kidd et al., 2006). It is modelled after a baby harp seal and is programmed to
                 respond to touch using simple sound and movement. PARO is mostly used as a compan-
                 ion robot. Several studies have been conducted particularly on its use with people with
                 dementia. In one study, where PARO was left in the public space of a nursing home, resi-
                 dents saw an increase in social activity through interaction with PARO.
                   To date studies using these SAR devices are generally small scale, i.e., a limited number
                 of participants. However, this is a growing field of research interest.
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347