Page 411 - Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Communication Competence Language and Communication Problems Practical Solutions
P. 411

Discrimination in discourses  389


                             As the article and especially the analysis of the example in section 5.6. have
                          shown, the problem of social discrimination in discourses is far too complex
                          to be grasped comprehensively by an exclusive analysis of intercultural com-
                          munication in a strict sense. Verbal and visual discrimination are topics which
                          are best approached in interdisciplinary analyses that combine the analysis of
                          intercultural communication with critical discourse analysis and, possibly, also
                          with politological analysis, social-psychological analysis, legal analysis and
                          economic analysis.




                          Notes

                          1. I would like to thank Helga Kotthoff and Ingrid Piller for constructive comments on an
                            earlier version of the article and Maura Bayer for correcting my English.
                          2. See Wagner (2001: 12–13) for a slightly different terminological distinction of “di-
                            rect” and “indirect” as well as “explicit” and “implicit discrimination”.
                          3. In comparison to Scollon and Scollon (2003a), Scollon and Scollon (2003b) mention
                            just two meanings of “discourse”. In the narrow sense – they explain – “discourse”
                            means “language in use”. In a broader sense, they regard “discourse” as “a body of
                            language use and other factors that form a “social language” such as the discourse of
                            traffic regulation, commercial discourse, medical discourse, legal discourse.” (Scollon
                            and Scollon 2003b: 210).




                          References

                          Berding, Dietz
                            2003    Gutachten über den antisemitischen Charakter einer namenpolemischen
                                    Passage aus der Rede Jörg Haiders vom 28. Februar 2001. In: Anton Pe-
                                    linka and Ruth Wodak (eds.), Dreck am Stecken: Politik der Ausgrenzung,
                                    173–186. Vienna: Czernin.
                          Billig, Michael
                            2006    Political rhetorics of discrimination. In: Keith Brown (ed.), The Encyclo-
                                    pedia of Language and Linguistics, Volume 9, 2nd edition, 697–699. Ox-
                                    ford: Elsevier.
                          Bough, John
                            2006    Discrimination and language. In: Keith Brown (ed.), The Encyclopedia of
                                    Language and Linguistics, Volume 3, 2nd edition, 694–696. Oxford: Else-
                                    vier.
                          Crenshaw, Kimberlé
                            1991    Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence
                                    against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299.
                          Van Dijk, Teun A.
                            1984    Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416