Page 206 - High Power Laser Handbook
P. 206

174   So l i d - S t at e   La s e r s     Intr oduction to High-Power Solid-State Lasers      175


                      All HAP SSL designs require some means of managing the impact of
                      thermal gradients on the extracting laser beam’s wavefront. There are
                      two geometric considerations here.
                         The first consideration is to select a cooling geometry that mini-
                      mizes the magnitude of the thermal gradients themselves. This leads
                      to a gain material shape with a large surface area for heat removal, so
                      that the surface heat flux is minimized. Furthermore, reducing the
                      thickness of the gain material along the direction normal to the cool-
                      ing  surface  will  reduce  the  temperature  rise.  Hence,  the  desire  to
                      minimize thermal gradients in SSLs invariably leads to high-aspect
                      ratio structures.
                         The second consideration is to select a laser extraction geometry
                      that has little or no sensitivity to thermal gradients—in particular,
                      one in which the extracting laser beam propagates with a vector com-
                      ponent aligned with the primary thermal gradient. As an example,
                      consider the slab geometry shown in Fig. 7.6, in which the slab is
                      cooled from both top and bottom, thus creating a temperature gradi-
                      ent  in  the  vertical  direction.  The  extracting  laser  beam  propagates
                      from left to right. If the extracting beam simply propagates straight
                      through the slab (Fig. 7.6a), then its center will sample hotter material
                      than the edge. The optical path difference (OPD) across the beam due
                      to slab thermal expansion (α) and index changes (dn/dT) is

                                                        α∆
                                     OPD =    /dT  + [dn  (n  − )]L T       (7.1)
                                                      1
                      With a slab length L of 10 cm and center-to-edge gradient ∆T of 40°C
                      (which are typical numbers for a 4-kW slab), the OPD is on the order
                      of ~50 µm, or 50 waves.  This much thermal focusing would prevent
                                          20
                      the beam from even propagating through the slab, much less with
                      good beam quality.
                         Compare this with the zigzag geometry of Fig. 7.6b, in which the
                      extracting beam reflects from top and bottom surfaces as it propa-
                      gates. After one trip from top to bottom, each part of the beam has
                      passed through the hot center and cold edges, hence experiencing


                                         Non-zigzag slab
                                                              Distorted
                                                             wavefront
                                             (a)
                                        Zigzag slab
                                                               Flat
                                                             wavefront
                                             (b)
                      Figure 7.6  Comparison of (a) straight-through and (b) zigzag slab cooling
                      and extraction geometries.
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211