Page 212 - High Power Laser Handbook
P. 212

180   So l i d - S t at e   La s e r s     Intr oduction to  h igh-Power Solid-State Lasers      181


                      a lens to correct for thermal focusing. Computer-controlled fabrica-
                      tion methods, such as magnetorheological finishing (MRF), provide
                      the capability to manufacture custom surface-relief profiles in silica
                      and other substrates, with spatial frequencies ~1 per mm and strokes
                      (wavefront amplitude) of multiple waves. 26,27  SPPs have been dem-
                      onstrated  to  increase  brightness  from  both  stable  and  unstable
                      resonators. 23,28
                         Although  SPPs  do  provide  simple  methods  of  correction,  they
                      can  be  cumbersome  to  implement  in  a  high-fidelity  system.  Gain
                      module OPD can be rigorously calculated using numeric models, but
                      in an HP SSL, residual OPD is often driven by uncontrolled compo-
                      nent variations rather than by deterministic design; therefore, an SPP
                      must be custom fabricated for each laser. This requires that the laser
                      first be built and its wavefront measured at full power before the SPP
                      can be made. Moreover, any change in the laser’s thermal profile due
                      to changes in operating power, component degradation, or the influ-
                      ence of the SPP itself on the extracting beam can invalidate the old
                                                                    23
                      wavefront map and require installation of a new SPP.  Finally, it is
                      difficult to achieve ~λ/10 fidelity given the accumulated tolerances
                      in wavefront measurement, SPP manufacturing, and final installation
                      and alignment; thus, even with an SPP, it is difficult to directly obtain
                      near-diffraction-limited beams from large apertures.
                         To further correct laser wavefronts, dynamic methods are often
                      employed  that  can  respond  in  real  time  to  changes  in  the  laser’s
                      aberrations.


                      7.5.2  Phase Conjugation
                      Phase conjugate mirrors (PCMs) represent attractive dynamic meth-
                      ods  for  wavefront  correction  of  high-power  lasers. A  PCM  differs
                      from a regular mirror in that it reflects the conjugate of an incident
                      wavefront. For example, whereas an incident diverging beam would
                      still be diverging after reflection from a regular mirror, it would be
                      converging after reflection from a PCM. This phase conjugation pro-
                      vides automatic correction of laser and optic wavefront aberrations
                      and beam jitters without active electronic controls.
                         One particularly successful implementation of PCMs in HP SSLs
                      has used stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) in liquid Freon.  The
                                                                           29
                      basic concept, implemented in a MOPA configuration, is shown in
                      Fig. 7.10. The low-power beam with a planar wavefront is incident on
                      the PA from the left. Upon the first pass through the PA, the beam is
                      amplified and aberrated. The aberrated beam is then focused into the
                      cell  containing  a  Brillouin-active  material.  Electrostriction  of  the
                      material near the beam focus creates a longitudinal acoustic grating
                      whose transverse phase profile is identical to the optical wavefront of
                      the focused beam. After Bragg reflection from this moving grating,
                      the return beam has the conjugate wavefront of the forward beam, so
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217