Page 76 - Historical Dictionary of Political Communication in the United States
P. 76

65
           HUTCHINS
                         outhouse.
                    in
                      an
           his  mother COMMISSION  Falwell  sued  for  libel  and  lost  because  as  a  public
           figure  he  was  required  to  prove  malice.  He  did,  however,  win  $200,000  for
           "intentional infliction  of emotional distress"  because the trial court ruled it was
           not  necessary  to  prove  malice  to  collect  damages  for  that.  But  in  a  unanimous
           1988  ruling,  the  U.S.  Supreme  Court  overturned  the  damage  award  and  ruled
           that  malice  would  thereafter  be  a  necessary  condition  for  a  damage  award  for
           emotional  distress.
           SOURCES: Wayne Overbeck, Major Principles of Media Law, 1997; Hustler Magazine
           v. Falwell,  485 U.S. 46, 1988.
                                                                  Marc  Edge

           HUTCHINS   COMMISSION.   Robert Maynard Hutchins, chancellor of the Uni-
           versity  of  Chicago,  chaired  the  Commission  on  Freedom  of  the  Press  (1942  -
           1947). Conceived by Henry Luce and funded  by Time and Encyclopaedia Britan-
           nica, the commission was formed in reaction to several challenges to press barons.
           These  included  threats  posed  by  media  critics  to  enforce  press  responsibility
           through more liberal libel laws and even direct government control or regulation.
           Another challenge was the increasing tendency of courts to define freedom  of the
           press  as the right  of individual  citizens  to accurate  and comprehensive  informa-
           tion, rather than freedom  from government control for the news industry.
             The commission's  report called  for  self-regulation.  Also,  "free press"  should
           provide  the  public  with:
           1.  A truthful  account  of  the day's  events in a context  that  gives them meaning.
           2.  A forum  for  the exchange  of  comment  and criticism.
           3.  A representative picture  of constituent  groups in society.
           4.  The presentation  and clarification  of  the goals  and values  of  society.
           5.  Full  access to the day's intelligence.
             Reaction by publishers and editors was negative due to the closed proceedings
           of  the commission,  its  attacks  on  the triviality  and  sensationalism  of news cov-
           erage,  and  the  lack  of  direct  participation  by journalists. Nevertheless, many  of
           the recommendations  of  the  commission  have  been  adopted.
             While  the main report  of the commission  was in a brief  book entitled A  Free
           and  Responsible  Press,  six  other  books  on  various  aspects  and  issues  of  the
           media  were produced  by  members  of  the  commission.
           SOURCES: Stephen Bates, Realigning Journalism with Democracy: The Hutchins Com-
           mission,  Its Times,  and Ours, 1995; Margaret  Blanchard,  "The  Hutchins  Commission,
           the Press and the Responsibility Concept," Journalism Monographs, No. 49, 1977; Com-
           mission  on Freedom  of  the Press, A Free and Responsible Press, 1947; Frank Hughes,
           Prejudice and the Press,  1950.
                                                          David  C. Perlmutter
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81