Page 245 - The Power to Change Anything
P. 245

234 INFLUENCER


                 And here’s where Hopkins grins a bit. “We publish lots of
             graphs, charts and tables. But none has been more influential
             than the Guinea worm race. We harness the natural competi-
             tive instincts of people by preparing a racetrack with the names
             of each country (or even the faces of the campaign leaders) on
             each runner. It’s amazing to see how people respond not just
             to how many infections they have, but how many more or less
             they have than a neighboring country.”
                 Do these data influence behavior?
                 “I was talking with the president of Burkina Faso,” Hop-
             kins reports, “and sharing some concerns about the campaign.
             I had all kinds of graphs and charts, but the one he wanted to
             look at the most was the Guinea worm race. They can’t stand
             to be at the bottom. It gets their attention.”
                 At the corporate level, it’s easy to see how the flow of infor-
             mation affects behavior. The fact that different groups of
             employees are exposed to wildly different data streams helps
             explain why people often have such different priorities and pas-
             sions. Different groups, departments, and levels of employees
             worry about very different aspects of the company’s success, not
             because they hold different values, but because they’re exposed
             to different data. For example, frontline employees who inter-
             face with complaining customers usually become the customer
             advocates. Top-level executives who are constantly poring over
             financial statements become the shareholder advocates. And
             sure enough, the folks who routinely take quality measures
             become the quality advocates. No surprise there.
                 The problem with passion for a single stakeholder group
             isn’t that employees care greatly about someone or something;
             it’s just that it’s hard to expect people to act in balanced ways
             when they have access to only one data stream. For instance,
             members of a group of senior executives we (the authors)
             worked with were positively driven by their production num-
             bers, which they reviewed weekly. When issues of morale
             came up (usually with the issuance of a grievance), they’d
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250