Page 273 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power

P1: FpQ/IRK
CY101-Bimber
August 14, 2002
CY101-07
0 521 80067 6
Select Bibliography 8:6
Heckscher, Charles. “Defining the Post-Bureaucratic Type.” In The Post-Bureaucratic
Organization:NewPerspectivesonOrganizationalChange,editedbyCharlesHeckscher
and Anne Donnellon. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1994. Pp. 14–
62.
Heckscher, Charles, and Lynda M. Applegate. Introduction to The Post-Bureaucratic
Organization:NewPerspectivesonOrganizationalChange,editedbyCharlesHeckscher
and Anne Donnellon. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1994. Pp. 1–13.
Heckscher, Charles, and Anne Donnellon, eds. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New
PerspectivesonOrganizationalChange.ThousandOaks,Calif.:SagePublications,1994.
Heilbroner, Robert. “Do Machines Make History?” Technology and Culture 8, no. 3
(1967): 335–345.
Heinz, John P., et al. Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press, 1993.
Herring, Pendleton. Group Representation before Congress. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press, 1929.
Hill, David, and Krishna Sen. “The Internet in Indonesia’s New Democracy.” In The
Internet, Democracy, and Democratization, 3rd ed., edited by Peter Ferdinand. London:
Frank Cass, 2000. Pp. 119–136.
Hill, Kevin A., and John E. Hughes. Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the
Internet. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. Citizens, Politicism and Social Communication:
Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge
University Press, 1995.
Hughes, Thomas P. Rescuing Prometheus. New York: Pantheon, 1998.
Hula, Kevin. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics.
Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1999.
Internet Policy Institute. Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and
Research Agenda. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation, conducted in Coop-
eration with the University of Maryland, and hosted by the Freedom Forum, March
2001. http://www.netvoting.org/Resources/E-Voting%20Report 3 05.pdf.
James, Karen, and Jeffrey D. Sadow. “Utilization of the World Wide Web as a Com-
municator of Campaign Information.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., Aug. 27–31, 1997.
Jasanoff, Sheila, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, eds. Handbook
of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1995.
John, Richard R. Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Johnson, Paul E. “Interest Group Recruiting: Finding Members and Keeping Them.”
In Interest Group Politics, 5th ed., edited by Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis.
Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 1998. Pp. 35–62.
Jones, Steven G., ed. Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community.
Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1995.
Kahn,KimFridkin,andPatrickJ.Kenney.“DoNegativeCampaignsMobilizeorSuppress
Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American
Political Science Review 93, no. 4 (1999): 877–889.
Kamarck, Elaine Civlla, and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Democracy.com: Governance in a Networked
World. Hollis, N.H.: Hollis Publishers, 1999.

256