Page 338 - Intro Predictive Maintenance
P. 338

Establishing a Predictive Maintenance Program  329

            maintenance costs. A plant process layout is invaluable during this phase of program
            development. It is easy to omit critical machines or components during the audit;
            therefore, care should be taken to ensure that all components that can limit produc-
            tion capacity are included in your list.

            The listing of plant equipment should be ordered into the following classes depend-
            ing on the equipment’s impact on production capacity or maintenance cost: Class I,
            essential; Class II, critical; Class III, serious; and Class IV, others.
                  Class I, or essential, machinery or equipment must be online for continued plant
                  operation. Loss of any one of these components will result in a plant outage and
                  total loss of production. Plant equipment that has excessive repair costs or repair
                  parts lead-time should also be included in the essential classification.
                  Class II, or critical, machinery would severely limit production capacity. As
                  a rule of thumb, loss of critical machinery would reduce production capacity
                  by 30 percent or more. Also included in the critical classification are machines
                  or systems with chronic maintenance histories or that have high repair or
                  replacement costs.

                  Class III, or serious, machinery includes major plant equipment that does not
                  have a dramatic impact on production but that contributes to maintenance
                  costs. An example of the serious classification would be a redundant system.
                  Because the inline spare could maintain production, loss of one component
                  would not affect production; however, the failure would have a direct impact
                  on maintenance cost.
                  Class IV machinery includes other plant equipment that has a proven history
                  of impacting either production or maintenance costs. All equipment in this
                  classification must be evaluated to determine whether routine monitoring is
                  cost effective. In some cases, replacement costs are lower than the annual costs
                  required to monitor machinery in this classification.

            The completed list should include every machine, system, or other plant equipment
            that has or could have a serious impact on the availability and process efficiency of
            your plant.  The next step is to determine the best method or technique for cost-
            effectively monitoring the operating condition of each item on the list. To select the
            best methods for regular monitoring, you should consider the dynamics of operation
            and normal failure modes of each machine or system to be included in the program.
            A clear understanding of the operating characteristics and failure modes will provide
            the answer to which predictive maintenance method should be used.

            Most predictive maintenance programs use vibration monitoring as the principal tech-
            nique. Visual inspection, process parameters, ultrasonics, and limited thermographic
            techniques should also be added to the in-house program. The initial cost of systems
            and advanced training required by full thermographic and tribology techniques pro-
            hibits their inclusion into in-house programs. Plants that require these techniques
            normally rely on outside contractors to provide the instrumentation and expertise
            required.
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343