Page 214 - Intro to Space Sciences Spacecraft Applications
P. 214

Spacecraft Design
                                                                                   201
                     with design of  the system prior to production. The planning, acquisition,
                     and use periods represent time-based periods in a system’s life cycle.

                     System Design Process

                       While the system life cycle identifies the different periods and phases
                     in the design of a complex system, the design process defines the funda-
                     mental sequence of  activities used for making design decisions (trade-
                     offs) during each phase. It is an iterative (repeated) method that results in
                     a  successively more detailed and optimized solution to the problem at
                     hand. The process is continued repeatedly until either an acceptable solu-
                     tion is reached or a decision is made to regress to a previous design phase
                     (or even back to square one!).  The process is broken into a number of
                     stages which are also indicated in Figure 9-1. These stages are discussed
                     in more detail in the following section, after which the phases in the sys-
                     tem life cycle will be presented in detail.

                     Design Process Stages


                     Gather Information. In the first stage, the designer (or group) gathers all
                     the information that may be pertinent to the problem. This includes the
                     inputs to the particular design phase (defined later), as well as overall sys-
                     tem constraints and purposes, which may be useful in establishing criteria
                     to which the inputs will be compared and optimized.

                     Value Model. The next stage uses the information gathered in the first
                     stage to formulate a function (model) that indicates the desired  perfor-
                     mance of  the system or element with respect to all pertinent considera-
                     tions (such as size, cost, and effectiveness). It is to this model that the
                     evaluation functions of all the possible approaches will be compared. In
                     general there are three important areas to consider:

                        Effectiveness:  ability to perform the  stated objectives. This mainly
                        deals with the physical capabilities of the solution.
                        Cost:  resources required by the solution.
                        Time: when the solution is required or how long it may take to pro-
                        duce the particular solution.

                       Many other considerations may be involved such as risk, politics, and
                     others directly associated with the particular need being addressed. These
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219