Page 102 - INTRODUCTION TO THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS
P. 102

A general existence theorem                                        89

                              1,p
                Let u ν ∈ u 0 + W  (Ω) be a minimizing sequence of (P), i.e.
                              0
                                  I (u ν ) → inf {I (u)} = m,as ν →∞.
                Wethereforehavefrom (H2+) that for ν large enough
                                                       p
                               m +1 ≥ I (u ν ) ≥ α 1 k∇u ν k  p − |α 3 | meas Ω
                                                       L
                and hence there exists α 4 > 0 so that
                                           k∇u ν k L p ≤ α 4 .
                Appealing to Poincaré inequality (cf. Theorem 1.47) we can find constants
                α 5 ,α 6 > 0 so that

                               α 4 ≥ k∇u ν k L p ≥ α 5 ku ν k W 1,p − α 6 ku 0 k W 1,p
                and hence we can find α 7 > 0 so that

                                           ku ν k  1,p ≤ α 7 .
                                                W
                Applying Exercise 1.4.5 (it is only here that we use the fact that p> 1)we
                                               1,p
                deduce that there exists u ∈ u 0 + W  (Ω) and a subsequence (still denoted u ν )
                                               0
                so that
                                      u ν   u in W  1,p ,as ν →∞.
                   Step 2 (Lower semicontinuity). We now show that I is (sequentially) weakly
                lower semicontinuous; this means that
                                u ν   u in W  1,p  ⇒ lim infI (u ν ) ≥ I (u) .   (3.2)
                                                   ν→∞
                This step is independent of the fact that {u ν } is a minimizing sequence. Using
                                                     1
                the convexity of f and the fact that it is C we get
                                         f (x, u ν , ∇u ν ) ≥
                                                                                 (3.3)
                    f (x, u, ∇u)+ f u (x, u, ∇u)(u ν − u)+ hf ξ (x, u, ∇u); ∇u ν −∇ui .
                Before proceeding further we need to show that the combination of (H3) and
                u ∈ W 1,p  (Ω) leads to

                                                                 p
                                                                  0
                                                                        n
                                          0
                                         p
                           f u (x, u, ∇u) ∈ L (Ω) and f ξ (x, u, ∇u) ∈ L (Ω; R )  (3.4)
                               0
                where 1/p +1/p =1 (i.e. p = p/ (p − 1)). Indeed let us prove the first
                                           0
                statement, the other one being shown similarly. We have (β being a constant)
                                                                    1
                      Z                          Z                        p
                                                    ³                  ´
                                     p 0        p 0        p−1      p−1  p−1
                         |f u (x, u, ∇u)|  dx ≤ β    1+ |u|   + |∇u|        dx
                       Ω                           Ω
                                                 ¡      p   ¢
                                           ≤ β    1+ kuk
                                                1       W 1,p < ∞ .
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107