Page 56 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 56

Audiences  39

             for example, were marketed as fine furniture (Siefert 1994) as were early
             radios (Smulyan 1994) and television sets (Spigel 1992), and the content
             of each of these was directed at emerging class and taste sensibilities. Early
             phonograph recordings tended toward the classical, and much of early radio
             was also addressed to bourgeois aspirations in the moral and cultural spheres.
             Audiences were further cultivated by formats and genres intended to locate
             these media at the center of the culture. During the great depression and
             the two world wars, film theaters presented the newsreels through which
             American and European audiences experienced the wars and radio flourished
             as more expensive entertainments were less available.
               By the 1950s, national media audiences had been well established, with a
             range of conventions and routines that firmly lodged them in the context of
             daily life. Thus, it came to be the case that the media were domesticated, and
             the domestic sphere mediated (Spigel 1992). Thus, audiences in the twentieth
             century revealed both acceptance and resistance, a seeming contradiction
             that continues to underlie public attitudes about the media today (Hoover
             2006; Hoover et al. 2004).


             Religion, spirituality, and the “common culture”

             Audiences are self-conscious about their practices, and this self-consciousness
             plays an important role in modern identity formation. Simply put, we are
             today well prepared to describe ourselves in terms of the media we consume
             and in terms of the kinds of media we reject or consume as a “guilty pleasure.”
             These reflexive self-descriptions are in a way a function or a result of the
             processes whereby the media have been “domesticated” and the domestic
             “mediated.” There is a sense in which this project is incomplete. Narratives of
             media in private life are far from tacit but carry specific and focused critiques
             of the media, critiques that are often religiously inflected. These critiques are
             complexly and incompletely related to behavior, and it is this contrast that is
             evidence of the extent to which the media are not fully domesticated,” and
             the domestic sphere is not comfortably mediated.
               It  is  a  widely  shared  stereotype  that  religious  people  tend  to  be  the
             most prudish or moralistic about media culture. Experience has led public
             discourse to expect that the more religious the audience, the more likely
             they are to find fault with entertainment television, popular film, popular
             music, and other popular arts. These critiques serve the issue of identity in
             that such viewers are also likely to think of their view of media as important
             to describing who they are, that is, “...I am the sort of person who finds
             such-and-such program objectionable....” Popular discourse around the film
             The Passion of the Christ in 2004 clearly revealed these connections between
             media  preference  and  identity,  as  many,  many  conservative  Christians
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61