Page 295 -
P. 295

278                                                              Chapter 8



               grassroots approach is referred to as a folksonomy or as social bookmarking or tagging.
               The advantage of this third option is that metadata is created by the collectivity of
               users. All users should more readily understand the tags or data about data, not just
               their creators.
                    Social bookmarking is a method whereby users participate directly in the storage,
               organization, searching, and managing of web resources. One way is by saving
               personal bookmarks on a publicly accessible web site and then tagging these sites
               with your own metadata. Early sites include: del.icio.us (http://www.delicious.com),
               Furl (http://www.furl.net/), web page bookmarking sites, and Citeulike (http://www
               .citeulike.org/), a social citation site for scholarly publications. Other users can then
               view the bookmarks by category, search by key word or use other attributes. Users
               make use of informal tags instead of more formal cataloguing methods. Since all the
               tags originate from the intended end users, they are easier to understand than more
               standardized or top-down indexing terms. The major drawback is this very lack of
               standardization. There is no controlled vocabulary, that is, a list of standard keywords.
               So many errors can occur due to misspelling, synonym confusion, tags with more than
               one meaning, or tags that are too personalized. This situation brings us right back to
               the problem faced by more traditional cataloguing approaches: How to tag so that
               others can understand your tags?
                    In a KM context, social bookmarking makes it possible to share knowledge with
               others in a new way by sharing not only the original knowledge but also what you
               think about it (the metadata). The technology is easy to use with hardly any learning
               curve to speak of. The real potential lies in what the metadata can be used for. For
               example, if the knowledge resource (data) is a best practice, then the metadata (data
               about data) can include annotations about what others think of the best practice,
               testimonials, cautionary notes (when not to apply and why), and other contextual
               information that can greatly increase the successful use and reuse (application) of this
               knowledge. Social bookmarking is an excellent vehicle to peer-to-peer knowledge
               sharing and may play a greater role in future communities of practice. In a given
               community of practice (CoP), there is, in addition to a shared purpose and a shared
               repository, a shared vocabulary. Since CoP members share the same jargon, tagging is
               less likely to be a problem. Tagging for yourself should approximate tagging for your
               peers, who are neither unknown nor unanticipated users.
                    As social bookmarking sites mature and ever-increasing numbers of users participate
               in them, it becomes possible to see some patterns emerging with respect to the tags
               that are most commonly used. This tag  “ cloud ”  can be found by looking at the right-
   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300