Page 265 - Law and the Media
P. 265

15 Official Secrets



                                     John Wadham









                15.1 Introduction

                Sections 1 and 2 of the Official Secrets Act (‘OSA’) 1911 were rushed through Parliament
                in just one day, amidst the widespread public hysteria over national security that dominated
                the period leading up to the First World War. It is perhaps not surprising, given the speed and
                circumstances in which the Official Secrets Act found its way on to the statute books, that
                both sections attracted a great deal of criticism over the years. In particular, Section 2 was
                the focus of regular and damning attacks from judges, politicians and the media. In the 1970s
                the Franks Committee recommended its abolition after three defendants were acquitted in a
                case that became known as the ‘ABC’ case, involving the publication of an army document
                in the Sunday Telegraph.

                Recognizing the force of these attacks, the government published a White Paper in July 1988
                setting out its proposals for the reform of Section 2. Based upon these proposals, the Official
                Secrets Act 1989 received the Royal Assent some 10 months later, although Section 1 of the
                1911 OSA remains in force.

                Section 1 of the 1911 OSA provides for the offence of ‘espionage’. Section 2 of the 1989
                OSA provides for offences relating to the specific disclosure of official information.

                The restriction of freedom of expression by the OSA 1911 and the OSA 1989 is considered
                to be justified in order to protect national security. However, it has been said that:

                     Inconvenient or embarrassing revelations, whether for the Security Services, or for
                     public authorities, should not be suppressed. Legal proceedings directed towards
                     the seizure of the working papers of an individual journalist, or the premises of a
                     newspaper or television programme publishing his or her reports, or the threat of
                     such proceedings, tends to inhibit discussion.
                                 (R (on the application of Bright) v Central Criminal Court (2000))

                The government also frequently brings actions for breach of confidence as an effective
                alternative to a prosecution under the Official Secrets  Acts. Breach of confidence is
                considered at Chapter 6.
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270