Page 282 - Law and the Media
P. 282

Parliamentary Proceedings and Elections
             Similarly, advertising aimed at advancing a particular candidate is not permitted. However,
             the law allows advertising directed at advancing the general interests of a political party. The
             following are examples of the distinction:


                      In R v Tronoh Mines Ltd & Others (1952)  it was held that newspaper
                      advertisements condemning the financial policies of the Labour Party, which
                      appeared during an election, were not illegal because they did not relate to any
                      particular constituency. The court ruled that the law:


                  . . . does not prohibit expenditure, the real purpose or effect of which is general
                  political propaganda, even although that general political propaganda does
                  incidentally assist a particular candidate among others.


                      The same conclusion was reached in The Labour Party v News Group Newspapers
                      (1987). An organization calling itself the Committee for a Free Britain had, in the
                      middle of an election campaign, placed anti-Labour Party advertisements, which
                      focused on the views of ‘Betty Sheridan from Haringey’ and ‘Mark Jenks from
                      Mansfield’. The Labour Party sought an injunction to restrain their republication.
                      The judge found that because the particular wording of the advertisements ‘only
                      made sense in the national context there was no breach of Section 75 of the
                      Act’.


             Where expense is incurred primarily to oppose rather than support a candidate, it will be
             illegal. In DPP v Duffield & Another (1976) and DPP v Luft & Another (1977), money was
             spent on publicity and literature encouraging people in three individual constituencies not to
             vote for National Front candidates.  The House of Lords confirmed that if the dominant
             motive is to oppose one candidate, it inevitably follows that expense is intended to secure the
             election of one or other of his opponents.




             16.3.3 Broadcasting controls


             Section 93 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 places complicated controls on
             programmes broadcast during an election that concentrate on a particular constituency.

             Candidates are given significant powers to control programmes about their own constituency.
             Their rights can be summarized as follows:


                      Every candidate in the relevant constituency must consent to the transmission of a
                      programme
                      All candidates who take an active part in the programme have ‘copy control’ – in
                      other words, the right to edit in or edit out their own contributions to the
                      broadcast.
                                                                                           245
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287