Page 350 - Law and the Media
P. 350

The Law in the United States of America
             hosted by them. In 2000, a Florida state court ordered Yahoo! and AOL to hand over the
             identities of individuals alleged to have posted defamatory messages on bulletin boards
             hosted by them concerning the plaintiff, Eric Hvide. The plaintiff had issued proceedings
             against anonymous defendants called ‘John Doe 1 through 8, persons presently unknown to
             the plaintiff but whose true identities will be included in the amendments hereto when those
             identities are discovered’ (Eric Hvide v John Does (2000)).

             The case generated considerable controversy as a result of the implications for the loss of
             anonymity on the Internet. The American Civil Liberties Union, a non-profit organization
             ‘dedicated to preserving the principles of individual liberty embodied in the Bill of Rights’,
             filed briefs in the proceedings to address the issues involved in balancing the right of the
             plaintiff to protect his reputation and the First Amendment right of the defendants to speak
             anonymously. In October 2000, the Court of  Appeals in Florida upheld the order for
             disclosure against Yahoo! and AOL.

             There have been several cases where companies and individuals have issued proceedings for
             online defamation against defendants alleged to have posted defamatory statements on the
             Internet. In 1999, a San Diego company called ZiaSun Technologies sued four people for
             allegedly posting false information about the company in Internet chatrooms. The company
             sought an injunction preventing the defendants from posting further messages.  The
             defendants raised truth as a defence. In January 2000, a federal court granted the first ever
             preliminary injunction against Internet defamation (ZiaSun Technologies Inc v Floyd
             Schneider (2000)). The case was subsequently settled out of court.


             21.4.2 Copyright

             Existing works
             The Digital Millennium Copyright  Act 1998 (the ‘DMCA’) is the most comprehensive
             reform of United States copyright law for several years. It updates the Copyright Act 1976
             in the digital age by making it illegal to offer technology that circumvents copyright
             protection systems. It also implements the WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996.


             Several high-profile Internet copyright infringement lawsuits have been brought under the
             provisions of the Copyright Act 1976 and the DMCA by the Recording Industry Association
             of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).

             RIAA v Napster
             In December 1999, the RIAA brought proceedings for a preliminary injunction against
             Napster, the well-known music file swapping service.  The RIAA accused Napster of
             facilitating the direct infringement of copyright in music recordings by allowing users to
             exchange compressed files of copyright protected music through its online service.
             Following a finding of infringement, the court issued a preliminary injunction against
             Napster that effectively shut the service down (A&M Records Inc v Napster Inc (2000)).
                                                                                           313
   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355