Page 133 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 133

6.3 Green building materials                 129
              We carried out environmental impact characterization and normalization on the midpoint
            level (Strauss et al., 2006; Bueno et al., 2016), to compare the contribution of building materials
            to the total global impacts in different impact categories. In normalization, the characterized
            results of each impact category are divided by a selected reference value, which brings all the
            results to the same scale. Such normalization facilitates the interpretation of the results and
            helps us link the relative contributions of each building material to each type of environmen-
            tal impact.
            6.3.1.2 Results
              Existing researches show that around the world, 20% of the building life cycle energy con-
            sumption and environmental impacts are from the building materials (Adalberth, 1997).
            The environmental impact of building materialization on the environment includes 15 envi-
            ronmental impact categories such as climate change, surface acidification, the formation of
            photochemical oxidants, particulates, ozone depletion, ionizing radiation, eutrophication
            of fresh water, ocean eutrophication, human toxicity, freshwater, marine ecological toxicity,
            land ecological toxicity, fossil fuel consumption, and the loss of metal (Huang et al., 2017b).
            The main impacts of the built environment are water consumption, metal pollution, and
            global warming (Minho et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016).
              In our analysis targeting China as a case study, we found that 2 billion tons of building
            materials were used in China in 2000; this increased to 10 billion tons by 2014 (Fig. 6.2).
            The key building materials were concrete, sand, and gravel, followed by bricks, and cement
            for nonconcrete applications. Steel, limestone, and wood were used in relatively lower
            quantities.
              Our environmental impact assessment result show that steel, lime, glass, wood, and
            cement have comparatively higher environmental impacts per kg (Ek) than the other mate-
            rials. Scaling up the ReCiPe environmental impacts from 1kg to annual use amounts (Ev),
            we aggregate the contribution of each material to every impact category. The environmental
            impact indicators associated with the production of building material used in China in 2015






















            FIG. 6.2  Annual use of building materials for newly constructed buildings, 2000–15 (bar plot, left-hand axis) and
            annual growth rate of building material use (line plot, right-hand axis) (Huang et al., 2018a).
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138