Page 174 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 174
References 171
of LCA were emphasized. Then the relevant articles of LCSA were reviewed and summarized
for research trend analysis. The analysis of literature related to LCSA led to the conclusions
that:
• more work can be done to revise and modify the LCSA frameworks for application in more
complex environments;
• LCSA is a useful and feasible tool that will attract more studies in the future; and
• LCSA has great potential to be revised and applied in more cases for sustainability
analysis.
References
Akber, M.Z., Thaheem, M.J., Arshad, H., 2017. Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Pakistan:
policy regime for a sustainable energy mix. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.022.
Akhtar, S., Reza, B., Hewage, K., et al., 2015. Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for selection of sewer pipe
materials. Clean Techn. Environ. Policy 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0849-x.
Arena, U., Mastellone, M.L., Perugini, F., 2003. The environmental performance of alternative solid waste manage-
ment options: a life cycle assessment study. Chem. Eng. J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.019.
Atilgan, B., Azapagic, A., 2016. An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey.
Energy Policy 93, 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.055.
Chen, W., Holden, N.M., 2018. Tiered life cycle sustainability assessment applied to a grazing dairy farm. J. Clean.
Prod. 172, 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.264.
De Luca, A.I., Falcone, G., Stillitano, T., et al., 2018. Evaluation of sustainable innovations in olive growing systems: a
life cycle sustainability assessment case study in southern Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1187–1202. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.119.
Ekener, E., Hansson, J., Larsson, A., Peck, P., 2018. Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by
applying values-based sustainability weighting—tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels. J. Clean.
Prod. 181, 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.211.
Ferrari, A., Volpi, L., Pini, M., et al., 2019. Building a sustainability benchmarking framework of ceramic tiles based on
life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). Resources. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8010011.
Garcı ´a-Muin ˜a, F., Volpi, L., Ferrari, A., et al., 2019. Building a sustainability benchmarking framework of ceramic tiles
based on life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). Resources 8, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8010011.
Gencturk, B., Hossain, K., Lahourpour, S., 2016. Life cycle sustainability assessment of RC buildings in seismic re-
gions. Eng. Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.037.
Gulipac, S., 2016. Industrial symbiosis: building on Kalundborg’s waste management experience. Renew. Energy Focus.
Hannouf, M., Assefa, G., 2017. Life cycle sustainability assessment for sustainability improvements: a case study of
high-density polyethylene production in Alberta, Canada. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122332.
Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Guin ee, J.B., 2010. Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials
and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis. Polymer Degradation and
stability 95 (3), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.11.010.
Hossaini, N., Hewage, K., Sadiq, R., 2015a. Spatial life cycle sustainability assessment: a conceptual framework for
net-zero buildings. Clean Techn. Environ. Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0959-0.
Hossaini, N., Reza, B., Akhtar, S., et al., 2015b. AHP based life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework: a
case study of six storey wood frame and concrete frame buildings in Vancouver. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. https://
doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.920704.
Huang, B., Mauerhofer, V., 2016. Life cycle sustainability assessment of ground source heat pump in Shanghai, China.
J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.048.
Jacobsen, N.B., 2006. Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and en-
vironmental aspects. J. Ind. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545411.
John, E., Nicholas, G., 2018. Industrial ecology in practice: the evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. J. Ind.
Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.1.67.