Page 281 - Lignocellulosic Biomass to Liquid Biofuels
P. 281

Fischer Tropsch synthesis of syngas to liquid hydrocarbons  235


              discharge. During the straight conversion process, it has been considered
              that the catalyst surface is oxidized by water to produce H 2 and then sub-
              sequently reduced by CO, forming CO 2 [32,61]. Several experimental
              outcomes with different supported iron catalysts showed limited change in
              Fe cations; Rethwisch and Dumesic [128] discharged the direct oxidation
              process that was a favorable formiate with WGS reaction [35,107].



              7.5 Process simulation for Fischer Tropsch synthesis
              The FT synthesis process is extremely reliant on several parameters as
              temperature, partial pressure, feed flow rate, molar ratio of CO and H 2 O,
              and property of catalyst. To obtain a better product yield, researchers
              often conduct the experiments studying the effect of many parameters,
              especially for the development of new catalysts and could not afford the
              time and cost to carry out all the parameter combinations. Therefore
              computer modeling is necessary to explore the several parameters to
              understand the effects of new processing conditions, catalyst kinetics, and
              different kinetic mechanisms. There are four types of FT reactors available
              in commercial applications: (1) circulating fluidized bed reactor, (2) stan-
              dard fluidized bed reactor, (3) fixed packed bed reactor (FPBR), and (4)
              SPR [79]. Furthermore, FBR is recognized as nonfavorable for the pro-
              duction of liquid transportation fuels, because liquid phase products may
              cause catalyst agglomeration and a loss of fluidization [23,28,42,48,59].
              Moreover, FT synthesis reactors are also described as low temperature
              (LTFT) or high temperature (HTFT) reactors. The main difference is that
              a liquid phase forms when operating in LTFT reactors, while HTFT reac-
              tors operate entirely in the gas phase. LTFT fixed bed and slurry-phase
              are suitable for producing liquid hydrocarbons products. However,
              FPBRs could deactivate the catalyst, which may lead to temperature
              increase. On the other hand, these reactors show several benefits, such as
              ease operation, extra product separation device not required, and
              easy scale-up process. Several research studies for design and modeling of
              SPR exist in literature, while limited investigations on deigning and
              modeling are available on the FPBR. Furthermore, heterogeneous and
              single-dimensional PFR was developed to optimize the operational para-
              meters on large-scale reactors [12,42,43,113,126,129 131]. First two-
              dimensional plug flow, pseudo homogeneous model without intraparticle
              diffusion limitations was developed by Bub et al. [102]. Jess et al. [132]
              also described the use of a two-dimensional, pseudo homogeneous model
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286