Page 56 - Linear Algebra Done Right
P. 56

42
                                              only functions whose derivative equals the zero function are the con-
                                              stant functions, so in this case the null space of T equals the set of
                                              constant functions.  Chapter 3. Linear Maps
                                                                        2
                                                In the multiplication by x example, we defined T ∈L(P(R), P(R))
                                                                                                    2
                                                             2
                                              by (Tp)(x) = x p(x). The only polynomial p such that x p(x) = 0
                                              for all x ∈ R is the 0 polynomial. Thus in this case we have
                                                                        null T ={0}.
                                                In the backward shift example, we defined T ∈L(F , F ) by
                                                                                               ∞
                                                                                                   ∞
                                                               T(x 1 ,x 2 ,x 3 ,...) = (x 2 ,x 3 ,...).
                                              Clearly T(x 1 ,x 2 ,x 3 ,...) equals 0 if and only if x 2 ,x 3 ,... are all 0. Thus
                                              in this case we have

                                                                null T ={(a, 0, 0,...) : a ∈ F}.

                                                The next proposition shows that the null space of any linear map is
                                              a subspace of the domain. In particular, 0 is in the null space of every
                                              linear map.

                                              3.1   Proposition: If T ∈L(V, W), then null T is a subspace of V.

                                                Proof: Suppose T ∈L(V, W). By additivity, we have

                                                               T(0) = T(0 + 0) = T(0) + T(0),

                                              which implies that T(0) = 0. Thus 0 ∈ null T.
                                                If u, v ∈ null T, then

                                                              T(u + v) = Tu + Tv = 0 + 0 = 0,

                                              and hence u + v ∈ null T. Thus null T is closed under addition.
                                                If u ∈ null T and a ∈ F, then

                                                                   T(au) = aTu = a0 = 0,

                                              and hence au ∈ null T. Thus null T is closed under scalar multiplica-
                                              tion.
                                                We have shown that null T contains 0 and is closed under addition
                                              and scalar multiplication. Thus null T is a subspace of V.
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61