Page 71 - Linear Algebra Done Right
P. 71

Invertibility
                             Proposition: If V and W are finite dimensional, then L(V, W)
                      3.20
                      is finite dimensional and
                                        dim L(V, W) = (dim V)(dim W).                                       57
                         Proof:   This follows from the equation dim Mat(m, n, F) = mn,
                      3.18, and 3.19.
                         A linear map from a vector space to itself is called an operator.If  The deepest and most
                      we want to specify the vector space, we say that a linear map T : V → V  important parts of
                      is an operator on V. Because we are so often interested in linear maps  linear algebra, as well
                      from a vector space into itself, we use the notation L(V) to denote the  as most of the rest of
                      set of all operators on V. In other words, L(V) =L(V, V).           this book, deal with
                         Recall from 3.17 that a linear map is invertible if it is injective and  operators.
                      surjective. For a linear map of a vector space into itself, you might
                      wonder whether injectivity alone, or surjectivity alone, is enough to
                      imply invertibility. On infinite-dimensional vector spaces neither con-
                      dition alone implies invertibility. We can see this from some examples
                                                                        2
                      we have already considered. The multiplication by x operator (from
                      P(R) to itself) is injective but not surjective. The backward shift (from
                      F ∞  to itself) is surjective but not injective. In view of these examples,
                      the next theorem is remarkable—it states that for maps from a finite-
                      dimensional vector space to itself, either injectivity or surjectivity alone
                      implies the other condition.

                      3.21   Theorem: Suppose V is finite dimensional. If T ∈L(V), then
                      the following are equivalent:
                      (a)   T is invertible;
                      (b)   T is injective;
                      (c)   T is surjective.

                         Proof: Suppose T ∈L(V). Clearly (a) implies (b).
                         Now suppose (b) holds, so that T is injective. Thus null T ={0}
                      (by 3.2). From 3.4 we have

                                        dim range T = dim V − dim null T
                                                   = dim V,

                      which implies that range T equals V (see Exercise 11 in Chapter 2). Thus
                      T is surjective. Hence (b) implies (c).
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76