Page 80 - Linear Algebra Done Right
P. 80

Chapter 4. Polynomials
                       66
                                              4.4
                                                    Corollary: Suppose a 0 ,...,a m ∈ F.If
                                                                            2
                                                              a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z +· · ·+ a m z
                                              for all z ∈ F, then a 0 =· · ·= a m = 0.   m  = 0
                                                                             2
                                                Proof: Suppose a 0 +a 1 z+a 2 z +· · ·+a m z m  equals 0 for all z ∈ F.
                                              By 4.3, no nonnegative integer can be the degree of this polynomial.
                                              Thus all the coefficients equal 0.
                                                                                         m
                                                The corollary above implies that (1,z,...,z ) is linearly indepen-
                                              dent in P(F) for every nonnegative integer m. We had noted this earlier
                                              (in Chapter 2), but now we have a complete proof. This linear indepen-
                                              dence implies that each polynomial can be represented in only one way
                                                                                            j
                                              as a linear combination of functions of the form z . In particular, the
                                              degree of a polynomial is unique.
                                                If p and q are nonnegative integers, with p  = 0, then there exist
                                              nonnegative integers s and r such that

                                                                         q = sp + r.

                                              and r< p. Think of dividing q by p, getting s with remainder r. Our
                                              next task is to prove an analogous result for polynomials.
                                                Let deg p denote the degree of a polynomial p. The next result is
                                              often called the division algorithm, though as stated here it is not really
                                              an algorithm, just a useful lemma.

                        Think of 4.6 as giving  4.5  Division Algorithm: Suppose p, q ∈P(F), with p  = 0. Then
                        the remainder r when  there exist polynomials s, r ∈P(F) such that
                            q is divided by p.
                                              4.6                        q = sp + r
                                              and deg r< deg p.

                                                Proof: Choose s ∈P(F) such that q − sp has degree as small as
                                              possible. Let r = q − sp. Thus 4.6 holds, and all that remains is to
                                              show that deg r< deg p. Suppose that deg r ≥ deg p.If c ∈ F and j is
                                              a nonnegative integer, then

                                                                                       j
                                                                            j
                                                                 q − (s + cz )p = r − cz p.
                                              Choose j and c so that the polynomial on the right side of this equation
                                              has degree less than deg r (specifically, take j = deg r −deg p and then
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85