Page 211 - Machine Learning for Subsurface Characterization

180 Machine learning for subsurface characterization

improved oil recovery symposium; 21-24 April; Tulsa, Oklahoma. Tulsa, Oklahoma: SPE:
Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1996.
[10] Shaw J, Bachu S. Screening, evaluation, and ranking of oil reservoirs suitable for CO 2 -flood
EOR and carbon dioxide sequestration. J Can Pet Technol 2002;41(09):51–61.
[11] Zhang K, Qin T, Wu K, Jing G, Han J, Hong A, et al. Integrated method to screen tight oil
reservoirs for CO 2 flooding. In: SPE/CSUR unconventional resources conference; 20–22
October; Calgary, Alberta, Canada. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2015 [p. SPE-
175969-MS].
[12] Jarvie DM. Shale reservoirs—giant resources for the 21st century. In: Breyer JA, editor. Shale
reservoirs—giant resources for the 21st century. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: part
2—shale-oil resource systems. vol. 97. American Association of Petroleum Geologists; 2012.
p. 89–119.
[13] Kausik R, Craddock PR, Reeder SL, Kleinberg RL, Pomerantz AE, Shray F, et al. Novel
reservoir quality indices for tight oil. In: Unconventional resources technology conference;
20–22 July; San Antonio, Texas, USA. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2015.
p. SPE-178622-MS.
[14] Jin L, Sorensen JA, Hawthorne SB, Smith SA, Bosshart NW, Burton-Kelly ME, et al.,
Improving oil transportability using CO 2 in the Bakken system—a laboratory investigation.
SPE international conference and exhibition on formation damage control; 2016 24–26
February; Lafayette, Louisiana, USA. Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2016.
[15] Ling K, Shen Z, Han G, He J, Peng P. A review of enhanced oil recovery methods applied in
Williston Basin. In: Unconventional resources technology conference; 25–27 August; Denver,
Colorado, USA. URTEC: Unconventional resources technology conference; 2014 [p. URTEC-
1891560-MS].
[16] Alharthy N, Teklu T, Kazemi H, Graves R, Hawthorne S, Braunberger J, et al. Enhanced oil
recovery in liquid-rich shale reservoirs: laboratory to field. In: SPE annual technical
conference and exhibition; 28–30 September; Houston, Texas, USA. SPE: Society of
Petroleum Engineers; 2015. p. 28–30 September.
[17] Jin L, Hawthorne S, Sorensen J, Kurz B, Pekot L, Smith S, et al. A systematic investigation of
gas-based improved oil recovery technologies for the Bakken tight oil formation.
In: Unconventional resources technology conference; 1–3 August; San Antonio, Texas, USA.
URTEC: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference; 2016. p. URTEC-2433692-MS.
[18] Fai-Yengo V, Rahnema H, Alfi M. Impact of light component stripping during CO 2 injection
in Bakken formation. In: Unconventional resources technology conference; 25–27 August;
Denver, Colorado, USA. URTEC: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference;
2014 [p. URTEC-1922932-MS].
[19] Dadmohammadi Y, Misra S, Sondergeld C, Rai C, editors. Simultaneous estimation of
intrinsic permeability, effective porosity, pore volume compressibility, and klinkenberg-slip
factor of ultra-tight rock samples based on laboratory pressure-step-decay method. SPE low
perm symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2016.
[20] Wu K, Chen Z, Li X, Dong X. Methane storage in nanoporous material at supercritical
temperature over a wide range of pressures. Sci Rep 2016;6.
[21] Wu K, Chen Z, Li X, Xu J, Li J, Wang K, et al. Flow behavior of gas confined in nanoporous
shale at high pressure: real gas effect. Fuel 2017;205:173–83.
[22] Adekunle OO, Hoffman BT. Minimum miscibility pressure studies in the Bakken. In: SPE
improved oil recovery symposium; 12–16 April; Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. SPE: Society of
Petroleum Engineers; 2014. p. SPE-169077-MS.
[23] Ahmadi K, Johns RT. Multiple-mixing-cell method for MMP calculations. SPE J 2011;16
(04):733–42.