Page 345 - Managing Change in Organizations
P. 345

CarnCh18v3.qxd  3/30/07  4:39 PM  Page 328







                   Chapter 18  ■ Strategic convergence: a new model for organization change



                                                     Appropriate
                                                      structure





                                     Change
                                    accelerator                        Resonance
                                                      Ambition
                                                     and change
                                                     architecture






                                            Change               Change
                                           leadership             culture


                                  Figure 18.1  The change capability framework


                                  and appropriately comprehensive change architecture, while needed for success
                                  in change, are nevertheless insufficient of themselves. What matters is how the
                                  change architecture is operated and whether certain performance characteristics
                                  of change architecture are being established. These performance characteristics
                                  are grouped into five dimensions, namely appropriate structure, resonance,
                                  change culture, change leadership and change accelerator. I propose a series of
                                  questions to address any change situation in order to assess the change capabil-
                                  ity of the organization involved. This leads to the establishment of a change
                                  capability framework (see Figure 18.1 and the appendix on page 336).


                                  Ambition in change

                                  At one level this cannot be defined absolutely. The level of ambition must always
                                  be relative. Relative to ‘need’, where need is socially defined. True enough, but
                                  where expenditure, market or competitive pressures apply there exist some pretty
                                  compelling definitions of need. But we are also concerned to ask if a given set of
                                  change plans and objectives are achievable. What does that mean? Achievable
                                  given current skills, capabilities and resources? Or achievable given the organiza-
                                  tion’s ability to fill gaps in its profile of the aforementioned?
                                    Defined relative to ‘need’ even where the latter is imposed by political leaders . . .
                                  but note that corporate leaders are just as likely to impose cuts in order to reshape
                                  a business in view of current market size, market share and revenues and in prac-
                                  tice are not free of the need to ensure income flows for the organization. Thus,
                                  in practice, changes can be imposed in any organization.
                                    We can also define ambition in relation to former achievements. So a given set
                                  of change objectives may outstrip any attempted in the past. This clearly can
                   328
   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350