Page 121 - Marine Structural Design
P. 121

Chapter 5 Ship Hull Scantling Design by Analysis                       97


                 Fatigue Check
                 Only  cyclic  loads  are  relevant  in  the  fatigue  analysis.  Static  loads  should  therefore be
                 subtracted from the total design loads. Environmental loads for fatigue analysis may differ
                 from those for the yielding and buckling analysis. Either a stochastic or a simplified fatigue
                 analysis can be performed.  When a  simplified fatigue analysis is applied, the stress range
                 corresponding to a return period equal to the design life is calculated and the fatigue life is
                 then computed based on S-N curves. If the stochastic fatigue analysis is used, stress ranges
                 corresponding to each sea state in the wave scatter diagram are calculated by FE analysis, and
                 the fatigue life of each stress range is found using S-N curves. The cumulative fatigue damage
                 is then computed using the Miner-Palmgren Hypothesis:




                 where,
                       n, = Number of cycles in the ith stress range interval between stress range doiand
                           ACi+l
                       Ni = Number of cycles to failure at stress range (Ani + Aoi+,)/2 and can be read from
                        S-N curves
                      D = Allowable cumulative damage varies  for  different structural members,  which
                           should normally be less than 1.
                 However a significant safety factor is usually employed with the Miner-Palmgren Hypothesis,
                 and  D  is  often  less  than  0.1,  0.3  or  0.6 depending on the  type of  structure, the  strength
                 significance of the member, availability for inspection, etc. Reference is made to Part 111 of
                 this book for more information on fatigue assessment.

                 5.5  References

                 1.   ABS  (2002),  “Rules  for Building and  Classing Steel Vessels”,  American Bureau  of
                     Shipping.
                 2.   Liu, D,  Spencer, J,  Itoh, T, Kawachi,  S and  Shigematsu, K  (1992),  “Dynamic Load
                     Approach in Tanker Design”, SNAME Transactions, Vol. 100.
                 3.   Lloyd’s Register (1 996),  “Structural Design Assessment Procedure, Direct Calculation-
                     Guidance Notes”.
                 4.   Ziliotto,  F.  et  al.  (1991),  ”Comparison  of  Different  Finite  Element  Analysis  of
                     Transverse Frame of a 350,000 TDW Tanker”, Marine Structures, Vol. 4, No. 3.
                 5.   Zhao, CT, Bai, Y  and Shin Y. (2001), “Extreme Response and Fatigue Damages for
                     FPSO Structural Analysis”, Proc. of ISOPE’2001
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126