Page 20 - Mass Media, Mass Propoganda Examining American News in the War on Terror
P. 20

10                          Chapter 1

               media outlets are often very  effective in convincing or even manipulating the
               public of the desirability of mainstream political, economic, and social values at
               the expense of alternative paradigms that challenge the status quo.


                      Understanding Public Trust and Skepticism in Media

               CNN did not earn the name "the  most trusted name in news"  for no reason. A
               strong degree of trust has long characterized the tie that binds corporate media
               outlets and  the American people.  A  1998 Gallup poll  found that  Americans
               "have generally high levels of trust in many of the major sources of news and
               information to which they are exposed." This highest level of trust was seen in
               sources like ChN, as approximately 70 percent of those polled  said they were
               confident in  CNN's reporting  accuracy-an   intriguing revelation  considering
               that CNN scored higher in trust levels amongst those questioned than even re-
               spondents'  kends and  family, of which 64 percent of  those polled said they
               trusted.14 More recent polling has revealed a similar pattern, despite a modest
               decline in public trust in some media outlets, and in media overall. The results of
               a Gallup poll released in 2005 indicated that, of those Americans questioned, 74
              percent reported either "some"  or "strong  confidence"  in national newspapers,
               although these trust levels have fallen since 2000."
                  One could conclude from these polls that  much of the public views the
               mainstream media as a competent player in political life-as   an institution that
               is necessary in educating the American people. The polls discussed above sug-
               gest that a large segment of the public often are not as skeptical as they could be
               of potentially harmful ulterior motives that may drive media corporations out-
               side of "educating the public."
                  Americans have provided a number of  reasons to justify  their  favorable
               views of corporate media. These justifications include: happiness with access to
               "the  news and information they seek in a timely fashion; the breadth of [news]
              coverage; and the ability to stay informed about a wide range of news develop-
              ments, both locally and globally."'6 From these responses, one can discern that
              many believe the mainstream media provides quite a wide  range of views  in
              terms of its reporting of major news stories of the day. In regards to the "War on
              Terrorism,"  specifically the  invasions of  Afghanistan and  Iraq, one can  also
              conclude that a sizable percentage of the news-viewing public feels that media
              outlets have done a decent job in providing them with the information needed to
              make educated assessments of the government's performance in the foreign pol-
              icy arena.
                  Public trust in media has been reinforced in other studies. One CBS/New
              York Times poll released in January 2006 found that 63 percent of respondents
              held either a "great deal" or a "fair amount" of trust and confidence in TV news,
              newspapers, and radio. When asked about the honesty of mainstream news, 60
              percent of those surveyed felt that news media "tell the truth" either "all of the
              time"  or "most of the time"  when it comes to their reporting of current events.
              The same poll indicated that 69 percent of those surveyed felt that news media
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25