Page 289 - Mass Media, Mass Propoganda Examining American News in the War on Terror
P. 289

A Game Plan for Infinite War?






              In early 2005, President Bush addressed reporters' questions regarding whether
              a U.S.  attack on Iran would define the next stage in the "War  on Terror." Al-
              though Bush explained that the "notion that the United States is getting ready to
               attack Iran is simply ridiculous," he conceded that "all options are on the table."'
              Bush's evasive answer was significant in that it represented a neglected oppor-
              tunity for reporters to challenge the confusing messages the President was shar-
              ing about possible attacks against countries labeled as part of the "Axis of Evil."
              Important questions remain which should be  asked by media institutions inter-
              ested in informing the public about potential U.S. involvement in future military
              conflicts. Was the administration actually planning an imminent attack on Iran;
               and if so, what concrete and indisputable evidence, in light of the Iraq debacle,
              did  the  President possess to  show that  Iran posed  an imminent threat to  the
              American people? Most importantly, should the U.S. go to war with Iran over
              the alleged possession of weapons the United States itself already possesses?
              What are the implications of such a war when  other nation-states continue to
              possess such weapons and retain U.S. support nonetheless?
                  Whether reporters and  editors should take  an explicit stand by answering
              these questions is up for debate, but it is vital nonetheless that these questions at
               least be posed to the political establishment, so that the public may be better
              informed over the possibility for, and soundness of, military action against Iran.
              These necessary questions have often been glossed over by media still intently
              focused on the war in Iraq. Reporters, outside of a few exceptions like Seymour
              Hersh of the New  Yorker, have been reluctant to push the  administration too
              hard to reveal hrther details on whether it is planning on going to war with Iran.
                  Media deference, in the face of the Bush administration's attempts to por-
              tray Iran as an emerging threat, continues unabated, and in light of the quandary
              of Iraq. An important example of the lack of skeptical coverage of the U.S.  de-
              monization of "enemy"  states was  seen in the release of the Nuclear Posture
              Review (NPR). The NPR, published in 2002, was a high-level military policy
              document that  identified  a  number of  potential  targets  as  part  of  a  military
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294