Page 31 - Mass Media, Mass Propoganda Examining American News in the War on Terror
P. 31

Public Trust, Media, and the "War on Terror"   2 1

              media outlets like the New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times
              are also included, primarily because they set the tone and agenda for reporting
              coming out of locally-based newspapers, as well as for national and local prime
              time television news programs, and cable and radio news.
                  Some might  argue that to deal with American media  in the singular (the
              media "is,"  rather than the media "are")  is somewhat misleading in that media
              are not a homogenized system. Many media outlets allegedly take radically dif-
              ferent positions on current events than others do. For example, many citizens
              prefer to distinguish between papers like the New York Times (labeled "liberal'),
              as opposed to papers like the Washington Times or Fox News  (labeled "conser-
              vative").  Distinguishing between  such mediums  does  reveal  some  important
              differences between various mass media institutions. What this plural framing of
              the mass media misses, however, are the substantive points in which "liberal"
              and "conservative"  media outlets agree, such as the legitimacy of the Iraq war
              (at least in terms of promoting democracy and  stability). As this work focuses
              overwhelmingly on the ways in which mainstream media outlets are similar, it
              naturally adopts a definition of mass media from a singular perspective.
                  The mainstream American media is contrasted, collectively, with other na-
              tional media systems, such as those in Britain, Australia, and the Middle East.
              Aside from the American-non-American distinction in my analysis, I also create
              a dichotomy between the corporate U.S.  media-using   a variety of synonyms
              such as the "mainstream press,"  and the "establishment press" (or just "the me-
              dia")  used to describe it, and American Progressive-Left media (non-corporate
              media), or the "independent  media." As will become more apparent, American
              Progressive-Left media (as opposed to Right leaning media outlets) serve as a
              countervailing force against mainstream media in that they focus most stridently
              on questioning the legitimacy of U.S. foreign policy.


                                 The Importance of Framing

              Aside  from  mass  media,  other  important  concepts  in  media  studies  used
              throughout this book include framing and propaganda. The process by which the
              ideological viewpoints and narratives in the mass media are presented as "real-
              ity" can be explained, in part, as framing. Framing of the news refers to much
              more than a simple slant or bias of each individual story. Framing is the means
              by which an entire social reality is constructed. The narratives adopted by use of
              one frame over another inevitably influence how news consumers view impor-
              tant issues. The way a reporter, editor, or media institution chooses to fi-ame the
              news is representative of their preferred worldview. The manner by which media
              institutions portray the Iraq war (whether reinforcing or questioning it) reveals
              much about that organization's  stance in regards to the conflict. By rendering
              the war in Iraq as a struggle against terrorism  and  a quest to democratize the
              Middle East, those working within the corporate media are essentially sending
              the message:  "This  is what  I believe, this  is  what I  stand for,"  whether they
              choose to acknowledge it or not.
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36